: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:07 pm  

Wow you lot really are deluded. You actually think your reserves who have won only 8 from 10 are better than Wigans who have won 12 from 12.

As for the guy who said about first teamers playing in the reserves and then named Mathers (who is poop and signed as first chose full back) Tim Smith (who can't defend for toffee and has played more games in the first team) and Karl Pryce (who is bloody awful and lazy).

Oh and let's not forget Ainscough and Tomkins have played more first team games. You also name Eastmond, whose played what 4 first team games this season? Same with the others you mention too, only Wheeler seems to get regular spots.

You may have the better first team but as far as youngsters go, ours are better; yours just look good because they're breaking into a successful team. We'll see how well you go once you lose Long and Cunningham.

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:12 pm  

Enicomb wrote:

Wow you lot really are deluded. You actually think your reserves who have won only 8 from 10 are better than Wigans who have won 12 from 12.

As for the guy who said about first teamers playing in the reserves and then named Mathers (who is poop and signed as first chose full back) Tim Smith (who can't defend for toffee and has played more games in the first team) and Karl Pryce (who is bloody awful and lazy).

Oh and let's not forget Ainscough and Tomkins have played more first team games. You also name Eastmond, whose played what 4 first team games this season? Same with the others you mention too, only Wheeler seems to get regular spots.

You may have the better first team but as far as youngsters go, ours are better; yours just look good because they're breaking into a successful team. We'll see how well you go once you lose Long and Cunningham.

This isn't about "reserves" it's about "youth", very different, when wigan, as said before play Smith, Pryce, Phelps et al. in their "reserves". Saints very rarely play senior players in the reserves.

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:34 pm  

Let's not go overboard, whilst our youth teams are doing very well, so are theirs.

We just have a coach who is willing to risk them in the first team more often.

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:09 pm  

gateaux wrote:

go on then name this team and then we can begin compare to two

Veivers
Ainscough
Marsh
Thornley
Charnley
Pryce
Tomkins
O'Carroll
McIlorum
Prescott
Hansen
Mossop
Tomkins

Farrell
Davies
Flanagan
Tuson

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:23 pm  

RB wrote:

Veivers
Ainscough
Marsh
Thornley
Charnley
Pryce
Tomkins
O'Carroll
McIlorum
Prescott
Hansen
Mossop
Tomkins

Farrell
Davies
Flanagan
Tuson

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:38 pm  

What's up petal? Embarrassed that the team you posted would get whooped?

I would be if I were you.

: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:40 am  

RB wrote:

What's up petal? Embarrassed that the team you posted would get whooped?

I would be if I were you.

Adding Karl Pryce shows that you're clutching at straws. Classing a Bradford and Union reject as your own youth !!

: Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:32 am  

Ashmeister wrote:

Adding Karl Pryce shows that you're clutching at straws. Classing a Bradford and Union reject as your own youth !!

Ashmeister wrote:

10. Hargreaves

Nice try though.

: Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:33 am  

Mark Flanagan would win the game single handedly for Wigan . . . he has had first team experience at Halifax

: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:46 am  

RB wrote:

Veivers
Ainscough
Marsh
Thornley
Charnley
Pryce
Tomkins
O'Carroll
McIlorum
Prescott
Hansen
Mossop
Tomkins

Farrell
Davies
Flanagan
Tuson

Frightening side that.