Re: Scott Moore : Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:55 pm  

inside_man wrote:

And where in that did they say snorting coke and driving is less dangerous?

He said which is worse:

Snorting coke (on a night out for example)

OR

Drink driving.

2 seperate incidents.

Don't let facts get in the way of Saints fan giving a good tongue lashing.

Re: Scott Moore : Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:05 pm  

SaintsFan wrote: Then that shows what a dunce you are. Snorting coke and then driving, and drinking and driving, are both equally dangerous. Drivers should always be alcohol and drug free otherwise they are potential killers (more so than usual that is). Scott Moore is innocent until proven guilty. Note the word PROVEN. I think a decent discussion about his value to the team is threatening to degenerate into a thread that could get locked thanks to nobheads from other teams. Your right but Hock wasnt caught drug driving he was just caught with it in his system. So before calling people a dunce maybe reading correctly instead of just interpreting what you want! From what I know he will be getting off with it but that also doesnt mean he didnt do it! Saints had already had enough of him before this incident and this is also not his first drink driving incident!! Maybe its in the saints fans interest for him to keep boozing http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 1irys.html

SaintsFan wrote: Then that shows what a dunce you are. Snorting coke and then driving, and drinking and driving, are both equally dangerous. Drivers should always be alcohol and drug free otherwise they are potential killers (more so than usual that is). Scott Moore is innocent until proven guilty. Note the word PROVEN. I think a decent discussion about his value to the team is threatening to degenerate into a thread that could get locked thanks to nobheads from other teams. Your right but Hock wasnt caught drug driving he was just caught with it in his system. So before calling people a dunce maybe reading correctly instead of just interpreting what you want! From what I know he will be getting off with it but that also doesnt mean he didnt do it! Saints had already had enough of him before this incident and this is also not his first drink driving incident!! Maybe its in the saints fans interest for him to keep boozing http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 1irys.html

Re: Scott Moore : Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:13 pm  

Ian Roberts Closet wrote:

Your right but Hock wasnt caught drug driving he was just caught with it in his system.

Who knows whether he drove with coke in his system. He was caught while not driving; that doesn't mean to say he hasn't driven with it. He was a user after all.

Re: Scott Moore : Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:41 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Who knows whether he drove with coke in his system. He was caught while not driving; that doesn't mean to say he hasn't driven with it. He was a user after all.

Cracking response. Instead of just admitting you read it wrong (fair play, everyone does it) you dream up some scenario to keep going with what you read wrong.

Re: Scott Moore : Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:05 pm  

inside_man wrote:

Cracking response. Instead of just admitting you read it wrong (fair play, everyone does it) you dream up some scenario to keep going with what you read wrong.

I didn't admit anything. I never do. I am always right.

FACT.

Re: Scott Moore : Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:21 pm  

How long does coke stay in your system?

Re: Scott Moore : Wed Aug 17, 2011 6:35 pm  

Roughly 2-3 days. Weed is about 30 days IIRC. But, it all depends on amount used, method of ingestion etc. Habitual cocaine use can lead to it being recognised up to 12 weeks after consumption.

Re: Scott Moore : Wed Aug 17, 2011 6:45 pm  

Carlos Alberto wrote:

Roughly 2-3 days. Weed is about 30 days IIRC. But, it all depends on amount used, method of ingestion etc. Habitual cocaine use can lead to it being recognised up to 12 weeks after consumption.

So the chances are that hock at some point will have drove while coke in his system but obviously nobody but hock knows.

Re: Scott Moore : Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:12 am  

So Salford bound then?

Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:58 pm  

Well the Moore to Salford move has reared it's head again in the Rugby papers today. It says he has held talks with Salford. It says he is keen to move as he wants more first team starts and the article also says that Saints haven't /wont be asking for a transfer fee.