Re: Ben Fisher : Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:56 pm  

I don't think lance and lomax are great replacements as they are both runners. Flanaghan isn't a hooker but will do a job.

I think Royce is thinking the same way I am. We rely to much on roby and some games just don't suit robes running play and the likes of fisher offers something different from dummy half. It also gives robes a rest.

IMO it would be a good signing. The more I think about it the more I like the idea.

Re: Ben Fisher : Wed Dec 21, 2011 5:10 pm  

St pete wrote:

I don't think lance and lomax are great replacements as they are both runners. Flanaghan isn't a hooker but will do a job.

I think Royce is thinking the same way I am. We rely to much on roby and some games just don't suit robes running play and the likes of fisher offers something different from dummy half. It also gives robes a rest.

IMO it would be a good signing. The more I think about it the more I like the idea.

If he's thinking like you, does that mean the back on the bench has gone?

Re: Ben Fisher : Sat Dec 24, 2011 8:44 am  

He ain't good enough.

Re: Ben Fisher : Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:24 pm  

Ben Fisher? FFS we'd be better off with Climie Fisher!

Re: Ben Fisher : Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:25 pm  

McClennan wrote:

Ben Fisher? FFS we'd be better off with Climie Fisher!

They'd at least rise to the occasion.

Re: Ben Fisher : Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:49 pm  

McClennan wrote:

They'd at least rise to the occasion.

Quoting yourself. It's Not Supposed To Be That Way

Re: Ben Fisher : Wed Dec 28, 2011 8:12 am  

Gerry Mander wrote:

Quoting yourself. It's Not Supposed To Be That Way

Shush, you are just keeping the mystery alive

Re: Ben Fisher : Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:11 am  

bewareshadows wrote:

If he's thinking like you, does that mean the back on the bench has gone?

I think you know opinion on that, I'm not going down that route until the season starts.

Re: Ben Fisher : Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:56 pm  

St pete wrote:

I don't think lance and lomax are great replacements as they are both runners. Flanaghan isn't a hooker but will do a job.

I think Royce is thinking the same way I am. We rely to much on roby and some games just don't suit robes running play and the likes of fisher offers something different from dummy half. It also gives robes a rest.

IMO it would be a good signing. The more I think about it the more I like the idea.

I think you've warmed too much to the idea of it rather than the practicalities of Fisher being the player you imagine him to be

Re: Ben Fisher : Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:47 pm  

Sibbs Rhinos wrote:

I think you've warmed too much to the idea of it rather than the practicalities of Fisher being the player you imagine him to be

I just think he'd do a good job for us, add depth and means we can leave lomax, hohaia and flanaghan in their proper positions.

Fisher is a clever cunning player which IMO we needed in the games where teams nulified robes running game.

On the subject of roby, I don't think we can flog him like we did last year, the back end of the season he looked tired and didn't offer any impact like he had in the first half of the season.