: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:49 pm  

Blobbynator wrote:

Nobody was at home.

It's an irrelevant record anyway, I know it's all you Bulls fans can hang on to these days, but we've got bigger fish to fry.

I don't care, it means nothing, I just love the way an entire away match, which you lost, is now being erased from memory. It's like The Ministry of Truth. If we tell enough people that it was not actually away, then enough people actually start to believe it.
Its working.
In a few years, you will be telling yourself you won it too.

: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:50 pm  

gateaux wrote:

Keeping it simple


Home game = the team is playing at their normal ground against a team that is visiting (away team)

Away game = the team is playing at the regular (or sometimes in the case of wigan borrowed) ground of the opposition.

Neutral game = A game where both teams are playing at a venue different from their normal ground.

Understand how it works now?

Not really.
I assumed that home meant at home, away meant not at home. But that would be far too easy obviously.

: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:51 pm  

[quote="gateaux"]




(or sometimes in the case of wigan borrowed) ground

: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:53 pm  

debaser wrote:

I don't care, it means nothing, I just love the way an entire away match, which you lost, is now being erased from memory. It's like The Ministry of Truth. If we tell enough people that it was not actually away, then enough people actually start to believe it.
Its working.
In a few years, you will be telling yourself you won it too.

shouldnt you start winning HOME matches before you come on here?..

: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:55 pm  

debaser wrote:

I don't care, it means nothing, I just love the way an entire away match, which you lost, is now being erased from memory. It's like The Ministry of Truth. If we tell enough people that it was not actually away, then enough people actually start to believe it.
Its working.
In a few years, you will be telling yourself you won it too.

So then by your reconing the Challenge cup final of '97 was away and so you didn't have a run of 16 games anyway?
I didn't think so

: Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:01 pm  

Who really gives a sod about pointless records. i thought this thread was about the match.

I thought it was a very good professional performance by Saints today, Bradford are not a bad side but there big forward tired badly at the end of each half.

We just seemed to bide our time, bring Mauri on when they are tiring and the rest is history as they say.

All in all a good day out just one complaint, Bradford have some very attractive cheer leaders who were just in front of where I was sat, whenever Bulls scored they danced around shaking their pom-poms........
Not good for a man of my age.

: Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:12 pm  

debaser wrote:

I don't care, it means nothing, I just love the way an entire away match, which you lost, is now being erased from memory. It's like The Ministry of Truth. If we tell enough people that it was not actually away, then enough people actually start to believe it.
Its working.
In a few years, you will be telling yourself you won it too.

No I won't, because as I've already told you, I don't really care. The Grand Final is what I care about along with the Challenge Cup. Anything else is pretty much irrelevant.

Saint Simon wrote:

So then by your reconing the Challenge cup final of '97 was away and so you didn't have a run of 16 games anyway?
I didn't think so

: Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:13 pm  

Blobbynator wrote:

Funny how he hasn't replied

: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:23 pm  

debaser wrote:

Yeah, your point being?

I know it was not at home. So does everyone else, apart from Saints and the RFL apparently.

Superleague is based on 13 home games 13 away games 1 neutral game.

Saints have won all there away games lost 2 home games and lost 1 neutral game. Its dead simple really.

: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:57 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

So then by your reconing the Challenge cup final of '97 was away and so you didn't have a run of 16 games anyway?
I didn't think so

Owned