Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:35 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

You can't blame Eastmond for Saints pack getting battered. Wire could even afford the luxury of having Morley sat on the bench for the whole of the second half.

i was waiting for you rogues to add your valid opinion....no ones denying about our pack....but eastmond is SUPPOSED to run with the ball not get rid of it everytime he receives it.
he's been brought up through the ranks..wrapped in cotton wool etc..then all we keep hearing is *will he,or wont he go*..i for one wish the little upstart would go now.i think he think's if he goes to union he'll be another jason robinson playing for england..he'll never be good enough to lace robinson's boots....sam tompkins shows how to run with a ball eastmond show's nowt.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:36 pm  

he needs to go. no direction, didnt take the line on, not interested, chose wrong option numerous times and to top it all never acknowledged the fans at full time. disgrace!! the sooner he goes the better.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:36 pm  

Why all the speculation about his future.Its obvious by the way he is playing that he doesn't give a stuff about Saints.Get rid of him now and lets get on with life.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:39 pm  

Ace Face wrote:

he needs to go. no direction, didnt take the line on, not interested, chose wrong option numerous times and to top it all never acknowledged the fans at full time. disgrace!! the sooner he goes the better.

Id get rid just at the fact that he didn't acknowledge the fans. Just imagine tomorrow morning on Saints website Eastmond agrees Bath move, would make my day ALOT better!

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:41 pm  

Saint Jamie B wrote:

Id get rid just at the fact that he didn't acknowledge the fans. Just imagine tomorrow morning on Saints website Eastmond agrees Bath move, would make my day ALOT better!

i would rather play somebody out of position who is actually is interested in playin for the club, his mind is obviously elsewere.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:42 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

You can't blame Eastmond for Saints pack getting battered. Wire could even afford the luxury of having Morley sat on the bench for the whole of the second half.

I agree with you, our pack was battered and the wolves knocked the poo out of our pack but we spent enought time on the wolves line for eastmond to create something!

In the first half we was camped on the wolves try line for about 10/15 mins yet we still couldn't open them up.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:54 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

You can't blame Eastmond for Saints pack getting battered. Wire could even afford the luxury of having Morley sat on the bench for the whole of the second half.

If you couldnt see Eastmond clear lack of effort you want to get those Cherry an White specs of yours tested. The pack wernt great but a decent amateur scrum half could have managed what he dd tonight ... catch and pass

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:59 pm  

I do think his poor body language had a negative effect on the other players.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:03 pm  

The Eclipse wrote:

I do think his poor body language had a negative effect on the other players.

exactly - he simply didnt look interested - he trotted around pointing alot and then really didnt impose himself on the game. In my time watching saints ive seen some poor performances from halfbacks with far far less ability than Kyle but it's a long time since I've seen a less commitd player in the Red V. The lad clearly believes all his own hype, I honestly wish he'd just leave and free us up the cap room.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:36 pm  

Do you think Eastmond will be dropped for next week?
If so who do you think his replacement would be?