Re: Eastmond to Bath : Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:45 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

:SLEEPY:

PMSL

Just posted something along them lines!

Re: Eastmond to Bath : Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:53 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Ashton was allowed to leave in August, do you think Eastmond will last that long?

As others have said, Saints wanted rid of Eastmond with immediate effect so we could replace him but could not come to terms on compensation with Bath.

If Saints wanted to let Eastmond go before the end of the season they would have to pay out his contract.

I hope to God we start to see more committed displays from him now this is resolved and, failing that, I hope Royce has the conviction to make him play for the reserves because any more displays like Friday night and there will be riots at Widnes!

Re: eastmond replacement who and why : Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:55 pm  

Bring back Mel Holden.

Re: Eastmond to Bath : Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:57 pm  

Could we not just deregister him and take him off the salary cap?

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:58 pm  

Royce did confirm it on Merseyside, and that he'd be here til the end of the season.

Re: Eastmond to Bath : Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:00 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Could we not just deregister him and take him off the salary cap?

I don't think you can as the season has started. Warrington got away with it with Hicks as it was out of season.
I'm not 100% certain, but I think that's how it works.

Re: Eastmond to Bath : Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:03 pm  

St pete wrote:

Just posted something along them lines!

I don't think he realises that he comes across as a right tit sometimes - or maybe a left one, depending on your preference.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch ...

I think the situation with Kyle is actually quite similar to that of Richie Myler and his millions at Warrington. Two young guns, thinking they're ace and following the big bucks. McRae ditched Myler once he decided to leave. I think Royce should do the same. I don't think it will do anyone any good to have someone playing in such a crucial role who does not want to be there.

Re: Eastmond to Bath : Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:03 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Could we not just deregister him and take him off the salary cap?

Not with good reason, if he is fit and states he will play then you won't be able to de-register him.

We de-registered Daryll Cardiss (I think it was him) about 5 years ago becuase he was injured for a season so we were able to basically sack him.
But if a player is fit and able to play then his contract would override any desire by Saints to get rid of him.

Eastmond's Replacement. : Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:05 pm  

Could do worse than Chris Sandow at South Sydney. I believe that his contract is up at the end of the year. http://www.therabbitohs.com.au/default.aspx?s=player-profile-display&id=1473&player=chris-sandow&team=Rabbitohs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Sandow He's also not afraid of taking on the big boys - go to your favourite video site and look for Chris Sandow v Micheal Ennis.

Could do worse than Chris Sandow at South Sydney. I believe that his contract is up at the end of the year. http://www.therabbitohs.com.au/default.aspx?s=player-profile-display&id=1473&player=chris-sandow&team=Rabbitohs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Sandow He's also not afraid of taking on the big boys - go to your favourite video site and look for Chris Sandow v Micheal Ennis.

Re: Eastmond to Bath : Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:05 pm  

Fatbelly wrote:

But if a player is fit and able to play then his contract would override any desire by Saints to get rid of him.

He could be fired for disciplinary reasons. He's already had to issue an apology for his behaviour. If he doesn't give what is expected of him, that could be used to build a case for dismissal.