Re: Wellens : Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:27 pm  

Don Brennan wrote:

He had to do after everything he said on here.
In the past when Tomkins did Myler over the line he said nowt.
He doesn't fool me.

At the time I wasn't convinced it was a malicious "smash" as it looked like Myler hadn't grounded the ball and that Tomkins was trying to prevent it, but I accept the RFL's decision that it was (at least) careless. One of the mitigating factors of that case was that they know each other personally so I tend to think it's a reasonable explanation that there was no malice. Having said that, he is (as I've already acknowledged) becoming a liability and I would prefer him (and anyone else) not to tarnish our prospects or our reputation by acting like a dick. Being proud of your team doesn't mean you turn a blind eye to incidents, or worse - defend them - it means you'd rather have them not happen at all.

Re: Wellens : Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:37 pm  

TheElectricGlidingWarrior wrote:

Hey, it wasn't me trying to tell other people what they shouldn't post, in fact I'm inviting you to do disagree with me, but lol at the total inability to defend your point of view. I've got one guy telling me I shouldn't post stuff, presumably because he doesn't agree with it, and now you respond to my invitation to point out any inaccuracies with "We disagree with everything your write."

You've got to remember just who you're dealing with here EGW. Neanderthals from the dark side of Billinge lump.

Reasoned argument just doesn't cut it, they much prefer this type of thing

No direct YouTube links please. Carlos.

Re: Wellens : Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:06 pm  

TheElectricGlidingWarrior wrote:

I think you're stretching the definition of hypocrit there Don, and it seems rather desperate if you don't mind me saying. And quite obviously, I'd shut up about Wellens if nobody had responded to my comment with disagreement, but then that's how forums work and I think you know that. At least other posters are actually participating in a discussion... what are you doing?

I suppose you only ever comment on foul play that your team has never committed in their history, eh Don? Because if you didn't, well there's a word for that with which you're more than familiar. And your last comment is yet another in a long series which focus on attacking the arguer rather than the argument.

Point out all my posts over on cheryandsh1te and you just might have a point.
New name same old cr@p

Re: Wellens : Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:31 pm  

Don Brennan wrote:

Point out all my posts over on cheryandsh1te and you just might have a point.

People can post wherever they want mate. You want to post over there, go ahead, you don't need my permission and I certainly don't need yours. Getting so upset over an opinion that differs to yours says more about you than me, but don't stop on my account. I'm capable of discussing any opinion you want, but it seems you don't even have one.

And the point I made stands regardless of where you post. Using you're own argument, if you've ever criticised a player for doing something that a saints player has done at some point then you're a hypocrite, right, regardless of whether you actually condoned it or not? Not least because that's what you seem to be having a go at me for now, so you won't ever have done that, will you? I'm gonna guess you didn't get round to thinking that far into your argument though, you were only interested in a laboured attempt at detracting from the point I made, rather than challenging it.

New name same old cr@p

Any evidence for that?

Re: Wellens : Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:15 pm  

TheElectricGlidingWarrior wrote:

People can post wherever they want mate. You want to post over there, go ahead, you don't need my permission and I certainly don't need yours. Getting so upset over an opinion that differs to yours says more about you than me, but don't stop on my account. I'm capable of discussing any opinion you want, but it seems you don't even have one.

And the point I made stands regardless of where you post. Using you're own argument, if you've ever criticised a player for doing something that a saints player has done at some point then you're a hypocrite, right, regardless of whether you actually condoned it or not? Not least because that's what you seem to be having a go at me for now, so you won't ever have done that, will you? I'm gonna guess you didn't get round to thinking that far into your argument though, you were only interested in a laboured attempt at detracting from the point I made, rather than challenging it.

Any evidence for that?

You could never upset me.You amuse me.
Oh and Ive never pretended to be anything other than a one eyed Saints fan.
You on the other hand are a one eyed goon who pretends to be otherwise. Thats why I have no time for you. Your posts on here are loaded with deceit, your faux concern for the good of the game Is laughable.
Your quite simply a troll,which is fine, but your insistence that your actually trying to make a point Is what sets you apart.

Re: Wellens : Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:29 pm  

Don Brennan wrote:

You could never upset me.You amuse me.

Your obsession with me would seem to indicate otherwise.

Oh and Ive never pretended to be anything other than a one eyed Saints fan.

Well at least you're honest about your hypocrisy. It does make you wonder why you'd bother posting any sort of criticism toward me though when you've just demonstrated with that comment how worthless it is. Obviously nothing more than a wind up.

You on the other hand are a one eyed goon who pretends to be otherwise. Thats why I have no time for you. Your posts on here are loaded with deceit, your faux concern for the good of the game Is laughable.

And how have you come to that conclusion? What was it in particular? Come off it mate, you're inventing a persona for me just so that you can feel superior. Do you realise how pathetic that actually is? I said I'm happy to discuss any opinion you want to present and this is what you come up with?

Your quite simply a troll,which is fine, but your insistence that your actually trying to make a point Is what sets you apart.

That would be funny if it wasn't so tragically ironic pal. I'm just pretending to make a point am I? And you're not simply trying to wind me up are you not? Your posts have actually been aimed at discussion and not personal jibes and accusations have they? Back under your bridge matey.

Re: Wellens : Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:53 pm  

TheElectricGlidingWarrior wrote:

Your obsession with me would seem to indicate otherwise.

Well at least you're honest about your hypocrisy. It does make you wonder why you'd bother posting any sort of criticism toward me though when you've just demonstrated with that comment how worthless it is. Obviously nothing more than a wind up.

And how have you come to that conclusion? What was it in particular? Come off it mate, you're inventing a persona for me just so that you can feel superior. Do you realise how pathetic that actually is? I said I'm happy to discuss any opinion you want to present and this is what you come up with?

That would be funny if it wasn't so tragically ironic pal. I'm just pretending to make a point am I? And you're not simply trying to wind me up are you not? Your posts have actually been aimed at discussion and not personal jibes and accusations have they? Back under your bridge matey.

Can't direct link to youtube but the link I put on earlier is St Helens chav

just watch it and you'll see what you're up against.