Attendance figures : Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:06 am  

http://www.slstats.org/ Seeing as the Goons are constantly going on about our attendance, we only average 176 less than them. Pos Team P W L D F A P.D. Avg. Att. Pts 1 St. Helens 18 15 3 0 565 290 275 11,218 30 2 Leeds 18 13 5 0 480 283 197 12,796 26 3 Hull KR 18 11 6 1 432 351 81 9,216 23 4 Huddersfield 18 11 7 0 422 292 130 8,341 22 5 Harlequins 17 10 7 0 421 337 84 5,185 20 6 Wakefield 18 10 8 0 433 413 20 7,338 20 7 Warrington 18 9 9 0 403 437 -34 9,104 18 8 Wigan 18 8 10 0 426 371 55 11,394 16 9 Hull FC 18 8 10 0 342 407 -65 11,066 16 10 Castleford 18 8 10 0 378 449 -71 8,020 16 11 Catalans 17 7 10 0 386 462 -76 8,374 14 12 Bradford 17 6 10 1 364 452 -88 10,138 13 13 Salford 17 5 12 0 274 481 -207 7,292 10 14 Celtic 18 2 16 0 258 559 -301 6,049 4

http://www.slstats.org/ Seeing as the Goons are constantly going on about our attendance, we only average 176 less than them. Pos Team P W L D F A P.D. Avg. Att. Pts 1 St. Helens 18 15 3 0 565 290 275 11,218 30 2 Leeds 18 13 5 0 480 283 197 12,796 26 3 Hull KR 18 11 6 1 432 351 81 9,216 23 4 Huddersfield 18 11 7 0 422 292 130 8,341 22 5 Harlequins 17 10 7 0 421 337 84 5,185 20 6 Wakefield 18 10 8 0 433 413 20 7,338 20 7 Warrington 18 9 9 0 403 437 -34 9,104 18 8 Wigan 18 8 10 0 426 371 55 11,394 16 9 Hull FC 18 8 10 0 342 407 -65 11,066 16 10 Castleford 18 8 10 0 378 449 -71 8,020 16 11 Catalans 17 7 10 0 386 462 -76 8,374 14 12 Bradford 17 6 10 1 364 452 -88 10,138 13 13 Salford 17 5 12 0 274 481 -207 7,292 10 14 Celtic 18 2 16 0 258 559 -301 6,049 4

: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:21 am  

You're two points clear at the top of the table and we're struggling to make the playoffs.

How is the fact you're still averaging less than us an achievment?

: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 am  

are these att figures merely the home att or total att/no of games?

: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:28 am  

You're two points clear at the top of the table

4 points

: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:33 am  

Saintsnut wrote:

4 points

LOVE IT!!!!!

I have to say though that to be averaging the third highest attendance when our town is so much smaller than Leeds' Warrington, Bradford, Wigan Hull etc is pretty good in my book.

We can't magic a crowd out of thin air.

Well done Saints

: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:35 am  

ABP' wrote:

You're two points clear at the top of the table and we're struggling to make the playoffs.

How is the fact you're still averaging less than us an achievment?

the achievement imo comes from the fact our attendances are up on recent seasons and finally starting to get to an acceptable figure

: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:37 am  

ABP' wrote:

You're two points clear at the top of the table and we're struggling to make the playoffs.

How is the fact you're still averaging less than us an achievment?

Because Wigan's borough is twice the size of St Helens so do your maths

: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:49 am  

ABP' wrote:

You're two points clear at the top of the table and we're struggling to make the playoffs.

How is the fact you're still averaging less than us an achievment?

just proves how fickle you lot are!!

: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:56 am  

Rommel wrote:

Because Wigan's borough is twice the size of St Helens so do your maths

We also compete against a Premiership Football club and an NL1 club where as you have none.

Don't let that get in the way of ''Our attendances are nearly as good as Wigans'' celebration.

: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:58 am  

Am I the only one that thinks this has a lot to do with how little we've been on the box this year?

In the previous 2 seasons we were on almost every week but this year hardly at all. This must surely have an effect, after all we did use it as an excuse when our crowds were going down.

Is anyone sad/bored enough to know how many times we've been on compared to previous years?