: Sat May 16, 2009 8:52 am  

ex Bull Dog wrote:

Why so angry Catherine?

She needs to talk to Archbishop Keith the Appostle ( AKA... well AKA I suppose) and through his newly founded gospel, to provide ways in life of
soothing the angst and anger that is so evident

: Sat May 16, 2009 8:57 am  

bobsmyuncle wrote:

She needs to talk to Archbishop Keith the Appostle ( AKA... well AKA I suppose) and through his newly founded gospel, to provide ways in life of
soothing the angst and anger that is so evident

Careful - that's not funny...... apparently

: Sat May 16, 2009 9:30 am  

bobsmyuncle wrote:

She needs to talk to Archbishop Keith the Appostle ( AKA... well AKA I suppose) and through his newly founded gospel, to provide ways in life of
soothing the angst and anger that is so evident

I miss him

: Sat May 16, 2009 11:12 am  

ex Bull Dog wrote:

Careful - that's not funny...... apparently

And yet amazingly, "Mick Gledhill" and Harigeorgeson are still classed as funny. Strange world I tell thee.

[Pumpetypump]

: Sat May 16, 2009 1:13 pm  

The lass has a point. We ARE scum to be fair. Right? RIGHT? I don't know why I'm bothering asking you scum though.

I admire the fact that she "hats" the Bulls and believes you "shouldnt mess with Rob Burrows" which isn't even his name.

Would an "I hate Catherine Thomson" group be a. allowed and b. of interest to anyone? Perhaps a pic of her with scum scrawled in purple across it like rain man.

: Sat May 16, 2009 1:19 pm  

Shaggoth wrote:

The lass has a point. We ARE scum to be fair. Right? RIGHT? I don't know why I'm bothering asking you scum though.

I admire the fact that she "hats" the Bulls and believes you "shouldnt mess with Rob Burrows" which isn't even his name.

Would an "I hate Catherine Thomson" group be a. allowed and b. of interest to anyone? Perhaps a pic of her with scum scrawled in purple across it like rain man.

I'd join that.

Could we spell her name "Katherine Thompson" though, just to keep the authenticity of her original contribution flowing?

: Sat May 16, 2009 2:03 pm  

Although a counter group would be amusing, the pure fact that the group has been created by someone with such "special" skills is amusement enough. It kind of sums up the whole thing quite nicely to be honest.

What's the old phrase about who is the biggest fool? The fool or the ones that follow the fool? What does that make those joining the group led by a complete retard?

[Bullseye]

: Sun May 17, 2009 10:12 am  

Shaggoth wrote:

Would an "I hate Catherine Thomson" group be a. allowed and b. of interest to anyone? Perhaps a pic of her with scum scrawled in purple across it like rain man.

DO IT!

[Pumpetypump]

: Sun May 17, 2009 2:34 pm  

Very much work in progress but here is my homage... http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php ... 2354865827

Very much work in progress but here is my homage... http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php ... 2354865827