I thought last year most of the world was treated to photgraphic evidence of the preference of Oz players for their mates pets? Or was it just some biazzar pre-signing initiation ceremony for the Wolves?
I have not seen the photographic evidence for the Monaghan case, but it is surely another example of the strange Aussie/NRL morality. Other than a possible case of animal cruelty, why should such off-field issues determine whether a player is sacked or not? Unless criminal acts are being committed, what happens off the field should have no bearing on the game IMO.
More here on the Burgii living it up in Sydney. To think this could have happened at Bradford! I reckon Sammy would have a better chance of finding a girlfirend in Bradford in all honesty.
More here on the Burgii living it up in Sydney. To think this could have happened at Bradford! I reckon Sammy would have a better chance of finding a girlfirend in Bradford in all honesty.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
