New Stadium: terraces/seats or all-seater? : Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:50 pm  

As there has been some discussion about the proposed new stadium of the past week it would be interesting to see what the fans views are on this?

Would you like the stadium to be a mixture of seating and standing areas, or would you like it to be an all seater stadium?

: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:51 pm  

I've gone for the all seater option. I personally hate standing up at grounds, it's not very comfortable and old fasioned.

All seater for mine.

: Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:36 pm  

Mix for me, then people have the option and everybody is happy.

: Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:50 pm  

I ain't fused let's just get the bloody thing built.

: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:19 pm  

redeverready wrote:

I ain't fused let's just get the bloody thing built.

Roger that!

: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:09 pm  

redeverready wrote:

I ain't fused let's just get the bloody thing built.

Seconded, but for the poll, a mix like the Wire's HJ.

And while we're on wishing for stuff if/when we get a new stadium - we should name each stand after a Bradford Legend rather than just East/West/Main etc. The Trevor Foster Stand? The Keith Mumby stand? The Nick Zisti stand?.. maybe not that one but you get the idea.

Plus we should mark the occation if its ever comlpeted with some sort of statue/sculpture to stand out front of the old ground's most famous player or players, maybe with some representation of the old ground itself as its pretty unique.


But mainly... lets just get it bulit please

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:41 am  

Duckman wrote:

And while we're on wishing for stuff if/when we get a new stadium - we should name each stand after a Bradford Legend rather than just East/West/Main etc. The Trevor Foster Stand? The Keith Mumby stand? The Nick Zisti stand?.. maybe not that one but you get the idea.

Plus we should mark the occation if its ever comlpeted with some sort of statue/sculpture to stand out front of the old ground's most famous player or players, maybe with some representation of the old ground itself as its pretty unique.

Great idea, it would certainly be something I'd be in favour of.
However, with us not being the only ones using the ground and potentially not actually owning it (is that right?), then I don't think we'd get much say.

[Bullseye]

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:05 am  

redeverready wrote:

I ain't fused let's just get the bloody thing built.

Too bloody right!

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:31 am  

Wigan Bull wrote:

Great idea, it would certainly be something I'd be in favour of.
However, with us not being the only ones using the ground and potentially not actually owning it (is that right?), then I don't think we'd get much say.

Correct we wouldn't own it we would be the major tenant.

: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:31 am  

Would the 150 year lease still count, or would this be worked out on a different basis?