: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:08 pm  

LewisJ23 wrote:

Listning to Shenny now he says nothing wrong with tackle, says he expects it to be pushed aside.

Well he would say that wouldn't he!

(Don't think there was anything wrong with it either but you get my point...)

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:10 pm  

For me Deacon has been very poor for the past two seasons and I've never rated him that highley. It's about time Bulls looked beyond him.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:31 pm  

amberavenger wrote:

Well he would say that wouldn't he!

(Don't think there was anything wrong with it either but you get my point...)

You'd think so wouldn't you

But it was to tigertv so it wouldn't have been brought up in evidence.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:05 am  

Terry Monster wrote:

For me Deacon ... I've never rated him that highley. ...

As is your perfect right, and your guide dog's.

Just to check - this would be the same Paul Deacon as is. . .

Club record goals scorer
Club record points scorer
Selected in the Bradford Team Of The Century
Led the Bulls to 3 "top of the league table" seasons
3 Super league GF Winners rings
2 Challenge Cup Final winners medals

... that Paul Deacon?

Clearly not much cop, then.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:12 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

As is your perfect right, and your guide dog's.

Just to check - this would be the same Paul Deacon as is. . .

Club record goals scorer
Club record points scorer
Selected in the Bradford Team Of The Century
Led the Bulls to 3 "top of the league table" seasons
3 Super league GF Winners rings
2 Challenge Cup Final winners medals

... that Paul Deacon?

Clearly not much cop, then.

That Paul Deacon yes.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:21 am  

Terry Monster wrote:

That Paul Deacon yes.

I was just trying to explain to you how eccentric your rating system is. Obviously, I failed in that, but did succeed in showing how evolution has ensured that bone density is a surprising feature of human skulls.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:32 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

I was just trying to explain to you how eccentric your rating system is. Obviously, I failed in that, but did succeed in showing how evolution has ensured that bone density is a surprising feature of human skulls.

Yep, you illustrated your brain density perfectly. Well done on that one.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:45 am  

When Deacon went off you looked a bit lost at times, could be wrong but i don't think you had him on for the last 10 ?

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:55 am  

LewisJ23 wrote:

When Deacon went off you looked a bit lost at times, could be wrong but i don't think you had him on for the last 10 ?

He was rubbish mate. He has been all season.

: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:05 am  

Terry Monster wrote:

Yep, you illustrated your brain density perfectly. Well done on that one.

Hey, I see what you did there. You tried to make a funny! Well done.

It doesn't work, since you have a thick skull, and that's the fault I alluded to, whereas the greater the density of a brain, the more working neurons it would have and thus be better equipped. But a blue star for trying hard.


Now could you set some of your neurons to actually considering the point which I raised, which is why you have 'never rated' someone who has achieved what I listed in the game, or is this sh.it all you do?