: Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:52 pm  

Raynor is over rated and is now 31, a bad move IMO.

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:00 pm  

Wigan Bull wrote:

I would prefer Raynor and Semi!!

Rikki as cover? Release? Swap?

like aaron said rikki is steadily improving and we knew he was a bit of a project when we signed him. he's got time on his side compared to raynor so I'm happy enough to stick with him ( needs to work on his defence though) and we've got deceent cover in halley. Raynor would be a decent chunk of money which would be better spent elsewhere.

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:33 pm  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gareth_Raynor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gareth_Raynor

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:44 pm  

BradfordServiceCrew wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gareth_Raynor

You would do anything to get a link wouldn't you?

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:52 pm  

http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2009 Semi Tadulala v Gareth Raynor

http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2009 Semi Tadulala v Gareth Raynor

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:55 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

You would do anything to get a link wouldn't you?

BradfordServiceCrew wrote:

http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1=2009&hp1=221&hs2=2009&hp2=1070&stat=tries&season=2009


Semi Tadulala v Gareth Raynor

Yep. You would.

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:44 pm  

If you look at the 2008 stats instead (Raynors been injured this season) you can see that tadulala is by far the better option.