: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:11 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

Can't argue with that. Godwin should start based on today though.

I dont think Newton should be crucified for today, yes he had a poor game, but it's not like he preforms poor on regular occasions, i'd definatley give him chance to make amends. Godwin still on the bench for me.

Yeah Bullseye, I'd take Burgess and Scruton from the bench.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:12 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

I'd rather see Olbison get a place over Langley next week, he was useless again.

Not sure, I thought Langers made some ground today and was always busy, he was cream crackered when he came off.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:13 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

Not sure, I thought Langers made some ground today and was always busy, he was cream crackered when he came off.

I suppose, but he's not a LF. Donno or Burgess should get played at LF with Langers in SR.

[Bullseye]

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:18 pm  

The thing about Langley is that he isn't a creative player. People are looking for him to do things he just doesn't do.

We're lacking creativity in general but we won't get it from Langley. He's there to defend. We need to recruit from outside to get some creativity for next year.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:19 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

I suppose, but he's not a LF. Donno or Burgess should get played at LF with Langers in SR.

He's more of a loose than Sam Burgess will ever be.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:23 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

He's more of a loose than Sam Burgess will ever be.

In the game v France Burgess showed people what a LF is supposed to do.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:36 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

In the game v France Burgess showed people what a LF is supposed to do.

Maurice Lindsay could have played LF against France and showed people what one was meant to do.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:36 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

Maurice Lindsay could have played LF against France and showed people what one was meant to do.

Maybe. There was a reason why Tony Smith picked Burgess for LF for England, and not Langley.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:04 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

Maybe. There was a reason why Tony Smith picked Burgess for LF for England, and not Langley.

Burgess wouldn't have played loose though if O'Loughlin didn't pull out.
The past few games Sam has played at loose should be enough for anybody to see that he's never going to be a loose. Personally, I think he lacks the mobility and ball skills.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:11 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

In the game v France Burgess showed people what a LF is supposed to do.

Against a French side that would have probably lost to Batley.