I watched the first half but left after that.
From what I saw, it was typical Karl Pryce. Too big and good for that level of rugby, as he always was in our academy. We couldn't handle him at all when he was attacking, but he was twice as big as anyone on the field. Crossley was our biggest player and Pryce was easily bigger than him.
From what I saw of Rudd, he looked to have some potential, but clearly didn't have the positional sense. He did make one particularly good chase back though to save a try. Seemed to have some decent pace for quite a big bloke.
From what I saw, it was typical Karl Pryce. Too big and good for that level of rugby, as he always was in our academy. We couldn't handle him at all when he was attacking, but he was twice as big as anyone on the field. Crossley was our biggest player and Pryce was easily bigger than him.
From what I saw of Rudd, he looked to have some potential, but clearly didn't have the positional sense. He did make one particularly good chase back though to save a try. Seemed to have some decent pace for quite a big bloke.