Re: Toronto and our chances of SL invite : Wed Nov 18, 2020 6:26 pm
Bulliac wrote:
Who is paying for the refurb though?
IF we still had a sub-lease it would be our responsibility (under the terms of the last lease, anyway) but we don't have the money to do anything beyond the 'lick of paint' option - and even that would depend on fans buying the paint and bringing our own brushes (and turps).
Just to throw another 'undefined' into the equation, to the best of my knowledge the RFL haven't sanctioned our use of the Tetley's Stadium for next season. Though, technically, they did say for one season and no-one can seriously suggest we've actually had that yet but I'd assume the RFL would class it as a season.
IF we still had a sub-lease it would be our responsibility (under the terms of the last lease, anyway) but we don't have the money to do anything beyond the 'lick of paint' option - and even that would depend on fans buying the paint and bringing our own brushes (and turps).
Just to throw another 'undefined' into the equation, to the best of my knowledge the RFL haven't sanctioned our use of the Tetley's Stadium for next season. Though, technically, they did say for one season and no-one can seriously suggest we've actually had that yet but I'd assume the RFL would class it as a season.
Do you get refused a safety cert for lack of paint? I don't know. Or only because areas of the ground are unsafe or failing to meet health and safety, environmental health etc. Be that stairs, terracing, toilets. Surely the whole stand and the whole of the terracing didn't fall below the standard all at the same time. Could it be possible to refurbish some toilets and get a safety certificate for 8k capacity? Is our stand worse than plenty of others? Is the ground really worse than Derwent Park in Workington (which I love) and is similar in some ways? It seems to have gone from safe for 23K to unsafe for anyone in the time it took to discover Chalmers hadn't a sixpence.
I'm not suggesting that the stadium is fine or a long term option. I don't. But we do need to be in Bradford if at all possible.
Isn't this about what is unsafe with the ground rather than what is simply 'wrong' with ground when judged against a modern stadium. The latter would be a long list, the former maybe considerably less so