mystic eddie wrote:
Learn to read Adey FFS. I never said anything about finances. I simply said that I have got it in the neck for suggesting that Mr Hood is a fraud and somewhat "flexible with the truth" for ages now.
It appears that I was not too far from the truth about him now then doesn't it?
Or are you denying that I ever said anything against Mr Hood in the past?
Explained in that way, indeed I would not take issue with your argument. Nor can I take issue at all with you not rearing up unduly in response.
If we can agree that:
- my ongoing argument for years about the finances has been shown to have had more merit than you allowed; and
- your ongoing argument for years that Hood was being - well lets say at least extremely disingenuous, since I don't want to be accused of defamation - has been shown to have had more merit than I allowed,
Then we'll get along just fine?
And for the benefit of those others who are using this catastrophe to try and settle scores with me, I would just say that you were people who derided my argument that the root cause of a large part of our problems was lack of money. Whether, as e.g. Maislebugs in particular eloquently argued, the money issues could have been alleviated with a change of management is a separate and legitimate question - one I suspect we may soon learn the answer to. Whether, in going on ad nauseum about the financial situation I have been drawing attention to causes or just symptoms is probably central to any disagreement.
But, whilst both sides of the argument can and doubtless will claim they were right, rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic will not help our current situation, will it?