Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:45 pm  

In honour of the Cheltenham theme, some odds I'd give the runners and riders;

Stall 1 – Richard Lamb (&friends unknown - what is his angle/reason?) 10-11 (fav)
Stall 2 – BPA (&chancers) 18-1
Stall 3 – BCFC (probably my prefered option if they are serious) 12-1
Stall 4 – Omar Khan 100-1 (is he serious?)
Stall 5 – Koukash 500-1 (outsider as Im not sure this horse even exists!)

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:51 pm  

I heard that OK was part of Lamb's consortium

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:00 pm  

bulldogbull wrote:

I heard that OK was part of Lamb's consortium

A wolf in sheeps clothing perhaps

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:09 pm  

I'll have a fiver on stall 3 - you better pay out on those odds Duckman lol

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:27 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

Its weird how some people think ‘straight talking’ is something to be admired.

In my experience anyone I have met who has described themselves as ‘straight talking’ is generally just an insecure, insensitive asshat who lacks basic social skills and common courtesy. They seem oddly proud of their bravery in being so ‘straight talking’, like they imagine themselves as some harbinger of undiscovered simple truths, whilst the people they are talking to are simply equating straight talking with an abrasive, over-aggressive moron who needs to stop making these dumb generalisations, logical fallacies and insulting and offensive statements.

An inability for empathy, a lack of social grace, an under-developed ability to express and communicate ideas in a way that connects with the audience is not something to be proud of, it is evidence of a struggling intellect and frustration and insecurity in your own beliefs.

SmokeyTA wrote:

its a pretty interesting question though. Is Flexwheeler not more of an asshat for only pretending to be an asshat?

I mean i would have at least a little sympathy for someone who was just naturally an asshat, they have no choice about it, their asshattery is almost a disability.

Those who just pretending to be an asshat are making a deliberate choice to be an asshat, that surely must increase their asshattery level. Like an asshat Donnie Brasco they have spent so long thinking they were pretending to be an asshat they lines have become blurred and their very pretence of asshattery has drawn them in to being an asshat.

Thanks for the armchair psycho analysis. I never claimed straight talking was something to be admired, but this is an internet forum.

What you are basically doing, is taking my post, where I insulted no one, and using a pseudo psycho analysis of it to try assasinante my character! That's quite slippery and slimey. I think if you are going to try and deduce much from someones actual character, based on what they write on a recreational internet forum you are going to get nowhere fast. At best your post was foolish, at worst unsavoury and devious!

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:40 pm  

FlexWheeler wrote:

Thanks for the armchair psycho analysis. I never claimed straight talking was something to be admired, but this is an internet forum.

What you are basically doing, is taking my post, where I insulted no one, and using a pseudo psycho analysis of it to try assasinante my character! That's quite slippery and slimey. I think if you are going to try and deduce much from someones actual character, based on what they write on a recreational internet forum you are going to get nowhere fast. At best your post was foolish, at worst unsavoury and devious!

The problem is you're not very good at this. If you care to read other people's posts, you'll notice that nobody has said anything about your character. They have talked about your behaviour, then questioned what your motivation is and whether you are deciding to behave how you do or if you can't actually help it.

You are rather boring, but you provide a good excuse for us to behave like 'typical Bulls fans'. It's hard not to be self congratulatory where the point of comparison is you.

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:44 pm  

After the OKBulls hitting the buffers last year it is not easy to see how OK would pass the RFL fit and proper person test to run a club after last year, or that given his style he could work in a consortium?

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:48 pm  

In case RAB readers forget where our friend is coming from, here's our graham with a quick reminder.

FlexWheeler wrote:

Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:56 pm

Why are the bulls getting special treatment because of ''iconic status''?

They aren't bloody iconic anymore are they? They're a lump of sh*t. I'm sick of the whole fiasco and would be glad to see the back of them.

Points deduction and relegation please.

Can't understand at all why he's not welcomed with open arms on here.

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:52 pm  

This thread has run about half a dozen posts without one of our usual absolute ************** new friends lifting its arrse out of the slime to interject a fart. Is there a fault? I keep banging my screen, but nothing else is appearing.

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:55 pm  

If I had to pair Caisley with a party, it would most posibly be stall 3.

I still refuse to see any bulls with OK involved.