Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:57 pm  

FlexWheeler wrote:

Thanks for the armchair psycho analysis. I never claimed straight talking was something to be admired, but this is an internet forum.

What you are basically doing, is taking my post, where I insulted no one, and using a pseudo psycho analysis of it to try assasinante my character! That's quite slippery and slimey. I think if you are going to try and deduce much from someones actual character, based on what they write on a recreational internet forum you are going to get nowhere fast. At best your post was foolish, at worst unsavoury and devious!

Its not pseudo-psychoanalysis, I think you will find 'asshat' is the correct technical term: Defined by the psychological bible 'The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' or DSM, as those with delusions of relevance and wisdom but so foolish as to be unable to distinguish between an ass and hat, and as such end up with their heads so far up their own 'ass' they are wearing it as a 'hat' Ergo 'Asshat'.

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:24 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

This thread has run about half a dozen posts without one of our usual absolute arsoholic dic-khead new friends lifting its arrse out of the slime to interject a fart. Is there a fault? I keep banging my screen, but nothing else is appearing.

Seems one has already arrived.

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:43 pm  

I doubt that most fans would put up with any buyout with OK involved. I certainly wouldn't hand any money over if he is there as I believe he would take every penny out till he got his money back and then what?

BCFC for me as I am one of the group of supporters who believe Odsal is just too much of a drain on the club and I think VP is a good stadium. They must believe it can be converted a little to hold rugby matches. I doubt they will get involved unless they believe they can make it work!

My concern with Lamb is WHY?
I would prefer someone who lives here and is a fan of the game. What would be in it for a Londoner?

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:47 pm  

Stall 6. The RFL under the leadership of head trainer "Woodsy" with stable boys Rimmer and Solly who have recently passed a "dope" test, they actually have more than one in there. They are being offered at 999-1

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:52 pm  

Apart from the head up the ass that sounds worringly like me.

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:55 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

In case RAB readers forget where our friend is coming from, here's our graham with a quick reminder.

Can't understand at all why he's not welcomed with open arms on here.

Sorry, that post doesn't count. To meet FW's standards the post needs to be the best part of 4 years old and not actually relevant to what the rest of the thread is about.

[Bullseye]

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:57 pm  

Thanks FA. I think we’ve all got Flexy’s number now. He’s quite obviously a very poor troll who doesn’t realise people don’t just stick to one board.


Aaaaaanyway, back on topic. We should know a bit more by the end of the week.

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 5:30 pm  

I think some of these nags may have already thrown their riders - though there seems to be a suggestion one is trying to remount - in the Welsh sense - as he has already ******* the club once already!

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 5:31 pm  

pie.warrior wrote:

Stall 6. The RFL under the leadership of head trainer "Woodsy" with stable boys Rimmer and Solly who have recently passed a "dope" test, they actually have more than one in there. They are being offered at 999-1

Nice odds might be worth a cheeky quid

Re: The 5 runners and riders : Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:09 pm  

bulldogbull wrote:

I heard that OK was part of Lamb's consortium

Lambs denied ok is involved so if he is then lambs lied to fans already. Ross had OK as a standalone bid in today's t&a.