How could you suggest such a thing. Surely he would not have the arrogance to think that simply going public would have the gravitas to influence our experienced referees.
Surely he would have first voiced his concerns for the game to Redhall, and then after due consideration they would have conveyed their deliberations in an edict to refereees.

That's how it USED to work, before his influence at Rot Hall waned a bit...do keep up!



More seriously, I suspect TVOC is closest to the mark.

[size=59Sorry for "improving" your post...[/size

Sorry Adey, had meant to have sarcasm mode employed

You did and I read it exactly that way!




Just wanted to make sure it didn't go past our most recent supporters a bit fast!

Correct me if im wrong but didn't we beat both Leeds and St Helens by 4 points each?

Does this technically mean that his earlier comments about Bradford slowing the play down are nul and void or is it still not right because Leeds didn't win?

What a pillock.

After 2 pages of reasoned discussion I think your 3 word summation says it all.

Outrageous thing to say.

I could give you a clue.

It starts with T ends with r, and he is one.

He's a Trafficker?!!

Thank you

I've always had a way with words

That's surely no way to think about that fine, upstanding, honourable and selfless honest man? He who only ever puts the game, and helping out fellow clubs in need out of the pure goodness of his heart, well ahead of his own club's interests? Even if you "cohersed" him I'm sure he'd never do anything to give his club any kind of unfair advantage, so how can you think such of him? I'm sure that if Rugby League was empowered to canonize anyone it would be this perfect man?

I for one would most definitely canonize him. Oh yes. Absolutely.

I think a 155mm howitzer would do the trick...