: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:15 pm  

paulwalker71 wrote:

Since we're unlikely to progress beyond one match in the play offs

If we make the play-offs we'd have to be one of the favourites to win it, as we'd go in with a massive winning run, ie every match from now to the end of the season. So we'd have some how learned to get rid of all the mistakes that we make to throw away matches we could win.

And we know our players only turn up if they are playing Leeds or Saints.

: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:29 pm  

verynoble wrote:

If we make the play-offs we'd have to be one of the favourites to win it, as we'd go in with a massive winning run, ie every match from now to the end of the season. So we'd have some how learned to get rid of all the mistakes that we make to throw away matches we could win.

And we know our players only turn up if they are playing Leeds or Saints.

He has a point!

: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:32 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

He has a point!

But a point which kind of contradicts itself.

If it only turns up when playing Leeds or Saints, we can't win the rest of our games.

: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:36 pm  

DILLIGAF wrote:

But a point which kind of contradicts itself.

If it only turns up when playing Leeds or Saints, we can't win the rest of our games.

It was only a matter of time before someone else spotted that...

: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:31 pm  

ritz wrote:

Why dont we get the reporters in and go for most brothers in a match.

Halley
r sherriffe
sykes
nero
jessjo sherriffe
jefferies
deacon
jode sherriffe
newton
lynch
menzies
morrison
s burgess

t burgess
g burgess
a tate
m tate...yeah we`d get mullered but at least it would show us to be a family team.

The ones in bold don't even train full time.

: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:40 pm  

We`ve got one player who doesn`t train at all doesn`t stop him from getting on the pitch.

: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:09 am  

ritz wrote:

We`ve got one player who doesn`t train at all doesn`t stop him from getting on the pitch.

And a whole lot more who train very well but do nowt on the pitch.

: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:21 am  

I think part of your problem with youngsters is that wnem Mcnarmara does have them on the bench he only lets them play the last ten minutes or so so effectivley you have a team of only 16?

: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:24 am  

roo wrote:

I think part of your problem with youngsters is that wnem Mcnarmara does have them on the bench he only lets them play the last ten minutes or so so effectivley you have a team of only 16?

It's good for their development, letting them have 4 mins, that is.

: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:26 am  

roo wrote:

I think part of your problem with youngsters is that wnem Mcnarmara does have them on the bench he only lets them play the last ten minutes or so so effectivley you have a team of only 16?

Ten minutes?!?!?

Let's not get carried away. That would be a bit much for them apparently.