Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:32 am  

On what we have to go on so far, it would appear that Sheffield are being deliberately awkward for whatever reason. I expect it to be resolved fairly quickly but probably not before the crucial Easter period. Whether they have deliberately done that once they knew he was joining a rival is anyone's guess.

It is clear that Chisholm wants to be back at the Bulls so it will be a case of when, we just need to find out why the Eagles have got their knickers in a twist over this particular move!

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:54 am  

It's a ridiculous situation if the RFL don't check whether a player is registered with another club before entering new registration details.

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:07 am  

Whatever happens it's vexed people off on the Halifax board so it's been a success

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:58 am  

rugbyreddog wrote:

It's a ridiculous situation if the RFL don't check whether a player is registered with another club before entering new registration details.

If what Dane said on twitter is true, then it sounds to me like the papers he signed and Sheffield had promised to file with the rfl yesterday afternoon was in fact his playing registration (or release of such).
I really hope Dane is being honest and has email/text message proof of Sheffield's instructions. The speed at which Sheffield put their press release out last night kind of makes me think they knew what they were doing.

A shame really because up until now we've not had any bad blood with the Eagles. But if this is some spiteful attempt to disrupt our season then they can f*ck right off.

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:28 am  

Nothus wrote:

The speed at which Sheffield put their press release out last night kind of makes me think they knew what they were doing.

The cynic in me thinks the same. How long did Sheffields statement come out after ours? 5 mins? If Sheffield have said they will release him at a certain time to make us think its ok to sign him, then not done it to essnetially cry foul, then thats low. Almost laying a trap and we're naive to fall for it.

If they did sack him as Roger said then they wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Lets hope some head banging happens and this gets sorted amicably.

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:03 am  

Maccbull_BigBullyBooaza wrote:

Whatever happens it's vexed people off on the Halifax board so it's been a success

You could have 13 of him and we will still beat you. O Ali Ali Ali Ali alifax

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:17 am  

neilgreenwood wrote:

You could have 13 of him and we will still beat you. O Ali Ali Ali Ali alifax

I think most teams with 13 halfbacks on the field would lose to be honest.

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:38 am  

I'll forgive the fax fan today, we all get giddy on cup final day and today's the day for them!

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:47 am  

hindle xiii wrote:

Would Chisholm need a visa? I'm completely lost when it comes to those now. I was thinking if Yes then maybe we've finally cleared that hurdle.

Hasn't stopped Toovey working

Re: Chissy : Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:49 am  

thefaxfanman wrote:

Hasn't stopped Toovey working

ooooooohhhhh check her out