Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:53 am  

Keiththered wrote:

Irrelevant, as that does not belong to the Bulls.

Do keep up we know that. It's why its a sticking point.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:55 am  

I'm more interested in Frank's assertion that we will get new toilets

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:57 am  

Frank Whitcombe wrote:

Stay with me folks, ignore all the other noise I've been consistent from day one of this thread as has the party that met the RFL yesterday.

Like I said the grown up's got in the room, the talks were candid and nobody fell out and if this gets done we get new bogs at the very least

There's certainly a couple of twists and surprises to come, but all the stakeholders in these talks are serious and want the Bulls to thrive - that includes the RFL, if they lose a club like Bradford what hope does RL have!

But we could do without the claims that Bradford are the be all and end all of RL. You have recently been just another poorly managed club whose management have thought it ok to repeatedly stitch up local businesses and the taxman. Not to mention the staff of said businesses who may have had to forego parishes or even lost their jobs. I hope something works out for you but please less of if we are in trouble so is RL.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:59 am  

Nowt wrong with the bogs apart from the walk to the top, which probably near enough burns off my pre match pint. Silver linings.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:59 am  

Actually I feel quite nostalgic about the loos....

Four generations of my family have had a slash in there.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:01 pm  

SLPTom wrote:

Actually I feel quite nostalgic about the loos....

Four generations of my family have had a slash in there.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:03 pm  

SLPTom wrote:

Actually I feel quite nostalgic about the loos....

Four generations of my family have had a slash in there.

Maybe that's the sticking point...are the bidders flushed enough!

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:04 pm  

We had new loos when we moved back from VP, fwiw.

Somewhere I have a photograph of an as-yet unpissed in bog.

[Bullseye]

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:08 pm  

TBH the bogs behind the popular side are a bit minging. They need a bloody good clean at the very least. Some soap and hot water wouldn't go amiss either.

It is like having a slash in a darkened air raid shelter but it doesn't need to be a palace.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:10 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

You seem to be operating at the comprehension level of the average turnip, so i'll make this my last attempt to help you:

The lease, at this moment in time, is THE MOST RELEVANT thing. This is because the only bidder in town wants it off the RFL. If a deal is done then we have a club. If not then it's liquidation.

If you can't understand that, then ask somebody else.

I understand perfectly, thank you. There is no need for personal insults, I'm sure you are not a typical Bulls' fan. The point I was making was in relation to asset stripping. There are no assets to strip even if the bidder does manage to obtain the lease without planning permission for the development of the ground. That is no forgone conclusion but if a plan was accepted and the ground developed that could net the person taking over the club a tidy sum but could hardly be called asset stripping.