Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:46 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

What, so as a formal bidder she isn't entitled to be formally told the outcome, in case she tells someone else?

Is there an outcome?

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:51 pm  

Would have thought she was the obvious choice, she is the only one with access to the levels of cash needed to save the Bulls. unfortunately because of her partner she is seen as a threat by the powers that be to their own positions. Narrow minded to say the least.

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:11 pm  

bullsonfire wrote:

I think there should be a protest in the form of a boycott of the Magic weekend. Let's have no Bulls supporters in the crowd.

What good would that do?
Protest against a ruling body that has stepped in to keep the Bulls alive in approaching 3 years.

And continue to with wages due in a week and an administrater without funds to pay them.

Lay off the RFL.

This is all Bulls managements fault at owner level

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:14 pm  

Spannerz wrote:

Mandy Koukash ‏@MandyKoukash · 2m
Not very professional by the RFL /Administrator not to have contacted me 10 day after submitting my bid.

I saw this earlier today and I'm a bit confused now.

She said (either last week or the week before) that she had been told she would not be the winning bid. But if she's not been contacted by the RFL or the Administrator, who's told her that she wasn't going to win? And what have they (whoever "they" are) based that on?

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:23 pm  

W.T.F IS GOING ON wrote:

why weren't any of the potential buyers of the club told how much minimum investment would be needed before bids were submitted and also told that proof of funding would be required before been ratified by rfl. all seems booty about face.

They dam well are told for 6 or 7 weeks now.

So this proof of funds to the RFL (who do have funds and have been forced to use them on the Bulls behalf for nearly three years now)is not something that is suddenly being thrown into the hat.

All prospective bidders were made aware at the outset.

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:37 pm  

Rarebreed wrote:

Agreed, the RFL seem to be asking for compulsory euthanasia from us? The figures seem ridiculous? For a start the loan from Marc Green seems to have escalated from £150 to £240k. Does this mean the interest charged is carried on even when in administration?

The goal post will continue to be moved whilst we slowly bleed to death.

No other club have suffered in this way?

The £150k Whitcut borrowed in order to fund his purchase off Ok (secured on club assets and even giving the money lender one share (maybe Whitcuts one share!)will at Wonga rates now be £250K.
Green will be glad to get his £150k back I would have thought.

THE PAST 6 MONTHS HAVE SEEN THE BULLS AFFAIORS BRING THE GAME INTO DISREPUTE>

WELL DONE WHITCUT AND KHAN>
AND SUTCLIFFE.

THe RFL are sick of the nightmare.

If you do not have 4 million turnover you cannot pay wages of £2.5 million.
The Bulls have a falling turnover of £2.5 million and dropping rapidly.

Doctor Doctor please save the Bulls life

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:41 pm  

Bullpower2012 wrote:

What about your Mucker Caisley?? He had no money, is LETS NOT GO THERE SHALL WE, NOT WORTH THE RISK - PUMPERS and also vastly responsible for the current mess.....

Please do not insult me.
He is no mucker of mine.

My moneys on the doctor.
Cos without him this is a bridge too far.

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:53 pm  

Noble & Honest wrote:

What good would that do?
Protest against a ruling body that has stepped in to keep the Bulls alive in approaching 3 years.

And continue to with wages due in a week and an administrater without funds to pay them.

Lay off the RFL.

This is all Bulls managements fault at owner level

the bulls currently have no owner though?

the RFL seem to be dragging their heels about the winning big. I understand (and appreciate) they want the long term security of the club sorted but it's appearing counter productive at this moment in time.

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:10 pm  

Noble & Honest wrote:

What good would that do?
Protest against a ruling body that has stepped in to keep the Bulls alive in approaching 3 years.

And continue to with wages due in a week and an administrater without funds to pay them.

Lay off the RFL.

This is all Bulls managements fault at owner level

Could I ask, are you something to do with the RFL or the Bulls.This is not a dig it's a serious question

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:13 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

What, so as a formal bidder she isn't entitled to be formally told the outcome, in case she tells someone else?

Especially as last time Mr Lamb was the one who broke the news about who'd won the bid.