Noble & Honest wrote:
Sounds like you have given up then.
I will never give up, till they close the doors, but I am very short indeed of anything resembling optimism any more, and have had no confidence that we will even be able to complete this season for some time now..
Noble & Honest wrote:
sadly its your like that are there all the time that could not see it or did nothing but stick up for Khan.
My "like"?
Unless you can quote something specific that I said and which you wish to criticise, please don't bother. The only sad thing about it is your type hiding behind this sort of generalised disparaging "I knew all the time and you didn't" self-aggrandising bullcrap. So go and try to insult somebody where you have a chance of succeeding. There may be a "basic insults for keyboard warrior beginners class" starting up somewhere if you google it.
As however you imply "Khan bad" I will add that Khan saved the club from extinction, and I have said I will always be grateful to him for that. His management - and in particular Whitcut's - was clearly rubbish but it is a bit rich some poet-laureate wannabe that weirdly writes in verse, attacking a man who lost a whole bunch of money and a year of his life on at least trying to make the Bulls survive, and put on the line all his personal assets. Which he may yet lose as a result. Did you put everything you own in hock for the benefit of the Bulls? Yet you haven't a good word to ay about the only man who would, and did. Moore wouldn't. Lamb won't.
Noble & Honest wrote:
Please never infer racism on my part again.
In any thread.
I didn't "infer" racism, I objected to your racist comment. Your disparaging insults, which I won't waste the time looking up, were on the lines of Khan should have stuck to making curries or chapatis. If you don't make racist comments then I won't need to pick you up on them.
Noble & Honest wrote:
You can quote me as saying Khan Sutcliffe and Whitcut were arseoles.Which I have said from the first sounds they made.
But it took a while for your like to see the penny dropping.
Ah, so you think you have somehow definitively established that, for example, Gerry Sutcliffe "is an arseole". And you claim you said this "from the first sounds they made", whatever that ridiculous phrase means. But anyway you are lying, as your first post on these forums was only on 4 February 2014 and that seems like a helluva long time after the first sounds made by either Sutcliffe or Khan, however you may define "sounds". You have a need to be seen as wise, but all you are doing is being wise after the event. That's not hard, even if you aren't even very good at that.
Khan and Sutcliffe took over the club in AUGUST 2012. You appeared on here in FEBRUARY 2014. I don't believe you are so deluded you think you posted stuff a year and a half before you actually did, and therefore you are simply lying and hoping nobody will notice, or just possibly, delusional.
Noble & Honest wrote:
You will understand it one day.
Very good, and I thank you for your confidence, but for now, at least I understand it better than you. I have in the past corrected much of your serial bullcrap, such as your nutty claim that OK selling his shares would have somehow been "a fraudulent preference". You aim to come across as THE man with inside knowledge. You think ONLY YOU know "the truth" (ironically you aren't alone in that particular delusion). An example of your self-aggrandisement:
First post Ever.I"m the man on the Clapham Omnibus.Everyone else is letting emotion cloud clear thought.
"Everyone else"! But you.
We should be honoured you're here to set us straight, then, I suppose.
Except it is just transparent waffle; for example you posted on here that the Council had a debenture over OK Bulls Ltd's assets to secure their loan. You made that up. If you make up stuff like that, it just proves you spend a lot of time guessing which is fine - if you don't delusionally claim "to know". Ironically, I am sure you do have some sources of information, sadly you spoil it by throwing in pure inventions and presenting speculation as fact.
Noble & Honest wrote:
Now off my case and do one.
Fortunately for you I have an aversion to people who write semi-cryptic tomes in doggerel so don't bother reading most of your shiite. It is typical of your arrogant bluster that you even think you can tell other posters to "do one" but I am going nowhere pal, and if you post more bullcrap and if I feel like it I will be "on your case" as you choose to put it.
come on people get signing and make your voices heard !
