Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:02 pm  

I certainly will not enjoy the Bulls Going under. I just want them to be a viable club with owners who give a poop about the fans and their responsibilities to pay their bills.

I honestly hope they line up against Hull KR on day one of season.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:03 pm  

vbfg wrote:

Non-uniform day at work today and we all brought games in. Counting posters in this thread was mine. Here are the top twenty:



Be like Fonzy, Yolanda.

I'm no mathematician, but those figures dont add up.

If the top 5 people have posted over 100 each then surely the post count would be over 500; but its actually less than 300.

Its obviously a pareto view but those axis numbers look suspect.

Or have I totally misread it?

vbfg - you're not involved in any financial dealings with Mr Green are you

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:04 pm  

Duckman wrote:

no, my hourly rate cost quite a bit, and I'm not called lance.

The 15.48 deadline has been pushed back to 16.01 by the way, due to due diligence not being duly carried out, but that's just for you #intheknow

Knew I could trust you

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:06 pm  

Smack him Jimmy wrote:

I'm no mathematician, but those figures dont add up.

If the top 5 people have posted over 100 each then surely the post count would be over 500; but its actually less than 300.

Its obviously a pareto view but those axis numbers look suspect.

Or have I totally misread it?

vbfg - you're not involved in any financial dealings with Mr Green are you

That's a good point. That's why I am not an accountant.

Although on second thoughts. I might make quite a good one.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:08 pm  

Smack him Jimmy wrote:

I'm no mathematician, but those figures dont add up.

If the top 5 people have posted over 100 each then surely the post count would be over 500; but its actually less than 300.

Its obviously a pareto view but those axis numbers look suspect.

Or have I totally misread it?

vbfg - you're not involved in any financial dealings with Mr Green are you

How many posts per page.....

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:08 pm  

debaser wrote:

That's a good point. That's why I am not an accountant.

Although on second thoughts. I might make quite a good one.

Isn't it at nearly 3000?

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:09 pm  

Just noticed that Total RL have a reprint ( word for word) of their story from a few weeks ago as today's headline. - Leigh and Cas battle for Clare. . No explanation why this old story suddenly becomes a headline feature.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:10 pm  

Bull Mania wrote:

El Red will be delighted if we go under.

Dont get how people can enjoy people worrying about losing their jobs at christmas.

Or at any time. I really hope this works out for you (the fans) and if it does the new owners treat you better than you have been and that goes for all the local sponsors of players and the ground. Will those good folk want to keep investing in the club, players, ground. I hope so.
PS my wife is a bulls supporter. We are trying to help her

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:10 pm  

Its no wonder these talks are getting nowhere - the RFL are too busy cancelling England's sodding Dubai trip.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:11 pm  

Bullnorthern wrote:

Just noticed that Total RL have a reprint ( word for word) of their story from a few weeks ago as today's headline. - Leigh and Cas battle for Clare. . No explanation why this old story suddenly becomes a headline feature.

Must be going to announce who he's going to