Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:45 pm  

bullsonfire wrote:

Aside from the calamitous effect on players and staff it would actually be quite funny if the club is placed in admin again by the RFL's preferred owner. They really are a set of doilums.

Bradford fans have hailed OK then Whitcut and Moore and then the Lamb consortium as "saviours".....all 3 didn't have the cash to bail out the club. Now one of them wants his loan back, whilst another used a pay-day loan-shark to buy the club and the favourite to buy the club now owns that loan.....which I suspect increases daily at an alarming rate of interest.......The RFL are 100% correct in what they are doing, which is making sure this charade ends with a positive income this time.

As for Marwank's Missus.........she put in a bid that was lower than Lamb and Green, but now she/he is seen as the best bet.

Bradford will be better off with us in the Championship next year.

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:55 pm  

Whatever goes/has gone wrong, it's the RFL's fault.

Right bulls fans?

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:59 pm  

bullsonfire wrote:

Aside from the calamitous effect on players and staff it would actually be quite funny if the club is placed in admin again by the RFL's preferred owner. They really are a set of doilums.

what can the rfl do?

I thought the administrator decided who's bid is accepted?

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:02 pm  

He did, twice recently and we are still no flaming nearer

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:04 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

Bradford fans have hailed OK then Whitcut and Moore and then the Lamb consortium as "saviours".....all 3 didn't have the cash to bail out the club. Now one of them wants his loan back, whilst another used a pay-day loan-shark to buy the club and the favourite to buy the club now owns that loan.....which I suspect increases daily at an alarming rate of interest.......The RFL are 100% correct in what they are doing, which is making sure this charade ends with a positive income this time.

As for Marwank's Missus.........she put in a bid that was lower than Lamb and Green, but now she/he is seen as the best bet.

Bradford will be better off with us in the Championship next year.

Nice to see you think your own club have no aspirations of SL

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:12 pm  

FlexWheeler wrote: what can the rfl do? I thought the administrator decided who's bid is accepted? It's odd that one isn't it. Administrator accepts bid from Lamb, yet the RFL then contacts Lamb to state he was no longer their preferred bidder. link here; http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/11099116.Lamb_out_of_running_to_buy_Bradford_Bulls_after_latest_twist_in_saga/?ref=var_0

FlexWheeler wrote: what can the rfl do? I thought the administrator decided who's bid is accepted? It's odd that one isn't it. Administrator accepts bid from Lamb, yet the RFL then contacts Lamb to state he was no longer their preferred bidder. link here; http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/11099116.Lamb_out_of_running_to_buy_Bradford_Bulls_after_latest_twist_in_saga/?ref=var_0

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:14 pm  

I have to say the odd Bulls fan tweeting marc green that we don't want him are demented. How crass.

He has clearly tweeted that he has had ample opportunity to asset strip already. I'll wait and see what materialises tomorrow before slagging the bloke off.

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:20 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

I have to say the odd Bulls fan tweeting marc green that we don't want him are demented. How crass.

He has clearly tweeted that he has had ample opportunity to asset strip already. I'll wait and see what materialises tomorrow before slagging the bloke off.

I don't know too much about the guy, but anyone who's willing to input time and money into the Bulls gets my backing. Still don't think he's what we need, but beggars cant be choosers!

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:23 pm  

daveyz999 wrote: It's odd that one isn't it. Administrator accepts bid from Lamb, yet the RFL then contacts Lamb to state he was no longer their preferred bidder. link here; http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/11099116.Lamb_out_of_running_to_buy_Bradford_Bulls_after_latest_twist_in_saga/?ref=var_0 The whole thing seems to be one big cluster f*ck. One thing you can say with certainty about the RFL is that there seems to be very little transparency in anything they do.

daveyz999 wrote: It's odd that one isn't it. Administrator accepts bid from Lamb, yet the RFL then contacts Lamb to state he was no longer their preferred bidder. link here; http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/11099116.Lamb_out_of_running_to_buy_Bradford_Bulls_after_latest_twist_in_saga/?ref=var_0 The whole thing seems to be one big cluster f*ck. One thing you can say with certainty about the RFL is that there seems to be very little transparency in anything they do.

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:33 pm  

FlexWheeler wrote:

The whole thing seems to be one big cluster f*ck.

One thing you can say with certainty about the RFL is that there seems to be very little transparency in anything they do.

who are you and what have you done with FlexWheeler??? ....I completely agree with that.




....also agree on your previous point about it clearly being entirely the rfl's fault...all of it....sort of, if we ignore hoodkhansutcliffekhanwhitc##t .....