: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:57 pm
redeverready wrote:
Sorry Adey but I thinks that's a little unfair and just basing that on poster's you know. I know for a fact that their is 4 posters who hardly ever post mainly because of the attitude of 5 well known posters who definitely can't be classed at the NT gang.
Fair call, although I was responding to personal comments aimed at me. Although in fairness I don't see or talk regularly to any posters from the NT, so I really can only go on those I do know. I DO bump into people I know who are of that persuasion, and I respect their views, but I don't know whether they post on here or read on here - the latter at least must be probable.
But I think what you say leads to an important point - and its one that someone else alluded to on another thread earlier. What I think we have seen is a polarising of opinion on here of those who are concerned for and about the club - and in the main who are passionate supporters (even if they don't think they are...
). This inevitably pushes people to take more extreme positions than they otherwise might - ME, FA, af being good examples - and so increases the likelihood of group A getting right up the noses of group B. And it becomes increasingly hard to sit in the middle in group C! If that makes sense?
I guess that's sort of inevitable when people get frustrated with what they see as below-expectations performance on the park. The situation is not helped by the Punisher-types, whose object in life seems to be to sow discord and dissent wherever they tread and exacerbate the polarisation. After all, its much easier to attack a house divided?
Given that we are nearly all Bulls fans - one or two have come out of the closet and admitted they never were - then surely, in what are not the easiest of times for the club, we need to stand together a bit more? And if that means those at each of the poles cutting those at the other a little more slack, and reigning back on trying to grind the other down, that would be a sensible thing?