Well done for saying that. I have always thought their heart was in the right place and could,'t win whatever they did.
I've always suspected that they are inept but not malicious. We are a tinpot sport and shouldn't really be surprised when we don't have a slick governing body. We want them to accept culpability for their mistakes towards us, but the flipside of that has to be a willingness for us to say thanks when they put in the hard yards for us. IF indeed they have sought to help us proactively.
Surely they wouldn't become so entrenched in negotiations if they knew they hadn't got the funds to go through with it?
Well you may well be right, you'd think that in three days of talks that issue might have cropped up already.
I'm just nervous about it. Especially if it's Chalmers as he's not a money man and has a bit of a poor record with businesses in the past. If it's him who's pulling his strings?
If it transpires that we end up with a good rescue package partly as a consequence of positive negotiations by the RFL, and if it is clear their heart was in the right place, perhaps we should swallow it down and say ta.
What irks me most at this time is the fact that, although inappropriate, people would look to apportion blame for failure.Really sad that Bradford has spawned certainly three very wealthy 'sons' who unfortunately, whilst mindful of the situation, have no interest in becoming involved.