Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 12:05 pm  

[quote="Pumpetypump"]I don't think we should rest on our laurels with saving our club, we should aspire to solve the Middle East problem at the same time.

I was thinking that now we have a practicing Jewish owner, if we managed to also get some Koukash involvement then we'd be uniting the Jewish and Palestinians communities in our own humble way. Thereafter, we ring Jerusalem, tell them we've worked it all out and bob's your uncle..world harmony.

I can't see any flaws in my approach.[/quote

Shurly this Is a joke .And a disgrace.

Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 12:13 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

I don't think we should rest on our laurels with saving our club, we should aspire to solve the Middle East problem at the same time.

I was thinking that now we have a practicing Jewish owner, if we managed to also get some Koukash involvement then we'd be uniting the Jewish and Palestinians communities in our own humble way. Thereafter, we ring Jerusalem, tell them we've worked it all out and bob's your uncle..world harmony.

I can't see any flaws in my approach.

Careful - I know we want to get the gates up but preferably not with Mossad death squads and suicide bombers, but I am sure in most religions you could buy some serious deduction from your days in purgatory by giving generously to the Bulls!

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 12:16 pm  

Being Atheist with a very big A, I'm rather naive about the degree to which religious people can tap into their respective communities.

OK seemed to be making various noises about other Asian business links, developing the ground via Dubai etc. Can Marc tap into anything new from his background I wonder?

Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 12:41 pm  

As long as he breaks our run of schlimazels for owners, that will do for starters

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 12:43 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

As long as he breaks our run of schlimazels for owners, that will do for starters

Are you brushing off the Yiddish-English dictionary?

Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:16 pm  

Wooden Stand wrote:

Only the Administrator can confirm how much was owed to OKB creditors and how much cash (if any) has been paid to them following the sale of the Club.

Well, the preferred creditors are the administrator himself ?£60k more/less? I don't know how much he would charge for 8 weeks work. Anyone remember how much Guilfoyle charged?

Then the debenture is next - Mr Green himself. Reported in T&A as being in the order of £250k.

So if he paid about £300k or less for the club, creditors will get nothing I would think. Unless he voluntarily pays some now to have a better chance at appeal. Which would seem a bit of a gamble.

Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:04 pm  

RFL in Points for Cash Scandal!

Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:25 pm  

Highlander wrote:

Well, the preferred creditors are the administrator himself ?£60k more/less? I don't know how much he would charge for 8 weeks work. Anyone remember how much Guilfoyle charged?
..

At a guess, the Administrator's costs of Bradford Bulls Holdings amounted to £349,051, but the company's preferential creditors approved that their remuneration be restricted to the sum of £133,225 that they had already received.

Preferential creditors totalled £42k (not all seemingly claimed) and unsecured creditors nearly £1.3m

NatWest held a debenture but as the Bulls were about £23k in credit at the time it went bust, NatWest had no claim.

Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:01 pm  

Excuse me if I am being thick, but if Marc Green is one of the main creditors then surely that is one of the creditors settled?

Re: Ownership and twists : Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:12 pm  

debaser wrote:

Excuse me if I am being thick, but if Marc Green is one of the main creditors then surely that is one of the creditors settled?