BM wrote:
Oh yes the main benefit was obviously the 56 people's lives who would have been saved but while we have a chance let's not forget to mention that there would have benefits to the Bulls as well.
I may be accused if being too emotive ( and there's good reason ) with regard to any mention of the fire but City fans were tied to VP before the fire too. It's the club's history. You know much like the Bulls fans who refused to attend or the ones who complained about every little thing while spending two seasons at VP.
I may be accused if being too emotive ( and there's good reason ) with regard to any mention of the fire but City fans were tied to VP before the fire too. It's the club's history. You know much like the Bulls fans who refused to attend or the ones who complained about every little thing while spending two seasons at VP.
OK, there's probably no way to put across the sentiment I wanted to in a forum posting. Please take my word that I don't mean to be glib even if that is how it comes across. My point was that what occured that afternoon had longstanding effects on the city's sports clubs. How great that effect was we can debate, albeit with difficulty as already seen because it is easy to come across as being callous about the deaths and serious injuries suffered by so many people.