Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:25 pm  

el red wrote:

I'll make the same agreement as before. If the Leo Group bid has been around for more than the last week then I won't post on here again.

They are definitely a New Bid and it is totally dependent on the land at Odsal being made available. No lease means no deal as they are not too interested in the Bulls even though they have enough financial clout to take the club out of this mess and keep them out.

Ok el red - thank you for your clarification.

Frank - it's your turn. You said your horse was in it from the beginning - so either it was Chalmers (and that bid has been rejected) or you're suggesting Leo's bid has been on the table for a lot longer than a few weeks?

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:29 pm  

RickyF1 wrote:

Do they want the land for rugby use el? Or some of the land? Can do want they want with the rest as long as there is a stadium for the Bulls

They would have to have a new stadium, either at Odsal or somewhere else in area. The RFL would not allow them to have the lease if it meant no RL club. Frank is right in saying it's very complicated and more importantly the clock is ticking. It's also worth asking the question of would the fans be happy with a previous board member being involved if it meant saving the club, even if the fans didn't trust that person.

One way or the other this story has moved into the final chapter, just need to see if it's a happy ending or not.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:33 pm  

[code][/code]

el red wrote:

They would have to have a new stadium, either at Odsal or somewhere else in area. The RFL would not allow them to have the lease if it meant no RL club. Frank is right in saying it's very complicated and more importantly the clock is ticking. It's also worth asking the question of would the fans be happy with a previous board member being involved if it meant saving the club, even if the fans didn't trust that person.

One way or the other this story has moved into the final chapter, just need to see if it's a happy ending or not.

Thanks el red.

I would be more than happy, and I'm not bothered where the stadium is in Braford as long as it's in Bradford. Even though I live in a poop hole dewsbury.

Fingers crossed for a deal tomorrow. Also thanks for the info.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 10:14 pm  

el red wrote:

They would have to have a new stadium, either at Odsal or somewhere else in area. The RFL would not allow them to have the lease if it meant no RL club. Frank is right in saying it's very complicated and more importantly the clock is ticking. It's also worth asking the question of would the fans be happy with a previous board member being involved if it meant saving the club, even if the fans didn't trust that person.

One way or the other this story has moved into the final chapter, just need to see if it's a happy ending or not.

We have to hope that the administrator is sensible and doesn't everyone deserve a second chance, even Mark Moore?

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 10:16 pm  

el red wrote:

I'll make the same agreement as before. If the Leo Group bid has been around for more than the last week then I won't post on here again.

They are definitely a New Bid and it is totally dependent on the land at Odsal being made available. No lease means no deal as they are not too interested in the Bulls even though they have enough financial clout to take the club out of this mess and keep them out.

El Red is correct on the new bid front. Danny Sawrij made £12.5M from a turnover of £68M last year.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 10:22 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

El Red is correct on the new bid front. Danny Sawrij made £12.5M from a turnover of £68M last year.

Well hopefully he doesn't mind putting some of that profit into the bulls every year.

If they got into super league which I honestly believe Rohan is capable of he won't have to put much in. Look at wakey, can't see Carter putting millions in but they seem to be doing ok. Not saying world beaters but ok.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 10:36 pm  

RickyF1 wrote:

:lol:

Take ya sarcastic comments and shove em.

I'm hear to support the club and the players. I haven't done anything to offered or upset anyone.

Also never told lies or try fill people with rubbish. Not aimed at you.

dont feel victimised, RF1. This forum proves the old saying that masturbation makes you go blind. The inbred onanist mutual masturbators have been at it so long on this forum, they are blind to friend or foe.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 10:46 pm  

The whole situation has become ridiculous..
The NDA'S as well as lack of information from the administrator has driven
The rumour mill to a frenzy the likes have never been seen.

Today been an absolute joke one journo tweets picked up on and amplified
Within minutes yet it is still obvious nobody knows anything.

I'm still hoping it's someone taking hold that is ultimately interested in the Bulls or we will be raped for all we are worth and dropped on our arses.

Chalmers is gone it seems, and from irvins tweets he is too.

So who is the mystery man and who will run it?

I hope it's not a Green coup the guy is a turd.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 10:46 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

We have to hope that the administrator is sensible and doesn't everyone deserve a second chance, even Mark Moore?

It's clearly not up to the administrator though is it?

And I guess that's you saying that Mark
Moore is involved in the new bid?

Oh joy, which is least sh*t? Mark Moore or Marc Green? We are so spoilt.

I think maybe I won't bother.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Thu Dec 29, 2016 10:49 pm  

debaser wrote:

It's clearly not up to the administrator though is it?

And I guess that's you saying that Mark
Moore is involved in the new bid?

Oh joy, which is least sh*t? Mark Moore or Marc Green? We are so spoilt.

I think maybe I won't bother.

To be fair there isn't anyone on the face of the planet mick hasn't associated with the deal...

My pet border collie is part of the process according to that guy.