Re: Ownership and twists : Mon May 05, 2014 8:04 am  

FA, what did you think when you read this in the TnA article about the appeal?

“The notice of intention to appeal was lodged with the Rugby Football League, by former administrator David Wilson...".

The kite you were flying already had a large hole in it even before I advised you that 4.7 could apply to each of bb2014 and bbnl, and now it seems that the administrator is deemed to be a controlling person of the Club even though not incorporated. the administrator certainly was never an owner, nor was he deducted 6 points.

As you say, you don't have to read every post.

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon May 05, 2014 8:20 am  

Right, I'm sure I speak for many on here when I say that this discussion is boring as hell. At the moment it's all just conjecture and guess work.

So lets all put it away until the hearing has happened and then pick the bones out of that one?

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon May 05, 2014 9:09 am  

What he said...

Re: Ownership and twists : Mon May 05, 2014 3:21 pm  

martinwildbull wrote:

FA, what did you think when you read this in the TnA article about the appeal?

“The notice of intention to appeal was lodged with the Rugby Football League, by former administrator David Wilson...".

The kite you were flying already had a large hole in it even before I advised you that 4.7 could apply to each of bb2014 and bbnl, and now it seems that the administrator is deemed to be a controlling person of the Club even though not incorporated. the administrator certainly was never an owner, nor was he deducted 6 points.

As you say, you don't have to read every post.

I am getting fed up of this thread but have to respond as Yet again you get it wrong. The administrator did NOT lodge an appeal. OK Bulls Ltd (in administration) lodged the appeal. As it is a company, it can only act by it's duly authorised officers or in this case it's administrator who takes over their duties, but that does not alter the fact that the appeal is by OK Bulls Ltd. Or was, before the new owners, BBNL, made an unprecedented but successful application to take over the appeal.

The administrator is NOT the controlling person of OKBL. He never owns a single share. But he has full power to RUN the company in place of the controlling person/s ie shareholders, out of whose hands the running of the business has been taken. Or maybe you think that the administrator did become a controlling person, if so you need to remind me just when he passed the RFL's fit and proper person test as all new controlling parties must do?

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue May 06, 2014 7:48 am  

I wonder when this second new director will be announced.

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue May 06, 2014 9:40 am  

hindle xiii wrote:

I wonder when this second new director will be announced.

Can he play in the front row?

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue May 06, 2014 2:11 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: Yet again you get it wrong. This says otherwise.

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: Yet again you get it wrong. This says otherwise.

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue May 06, 2014 3:07 pm  

Re: Ownership and twists : Tue May 06, 2014 11:46 pm  

What do you make of rule 4.7 FA ?
Would you care/dare to take us through that again.

Sometimes I have trouble seeing wood for trees.

If you were the tree FA I think the wood would probably eat you.

Why don't you just come on out and scream it.

ITS JUST NOT FAIR AND AINT LEGAL.
4.7 Rule.

I can do what the fek we want.
If we don't like what you done.

GOT IT ?

Still aint fekking fair though is it.
On a positive note....who needs points back.
We only need the cup with money (does the cup give much? Money?)
A win or two will soon have us back from the dead.
3rd bottom is all that matters.
If it was right to give Ok 6 for Hoods indiscretions I'm sure 6 will stay in this case.
It does not matter whose fault you think it is.
Its what those who have seen and been made aware of EVERYTHING that matter.
And news of OK"s personal guarantee for everything at sept 2012 tells me how seriously the RFL were telling him.

The same message went forth to Wakefield last summer.
OK lied

Re: Ownership and twists : Wed May 07, 2014 12:02 am  

Are you drunk?