[Bullseye]

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:42 am  

If you go on TotalRL.com Adeybull has given plenty of explanation of how administration all works.

As for the rumour mill I suspect the journos are making it up as they go along and know as much as us.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:46 am  

If I didn't have anything to do for the next 25 years I would more than happily run Mr Green over with a steam roller, in a Road Runner cartoon style.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:46 am  

HamsterChops wrote:

Are they slagging me off on that too?

[Mild Rover]

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:59 am  

Bullseye wrote:

Green can't keep rejecting bids forever. The other creditors have a say too.

Depending perhaps on whether 75% of creditors or creditors who own 75% of the debt have to vote in favour, anybody with 26% or more would have an effective veto, I'd guess. It is just a guess though. Anybody with 76% or more could pick and choose. If Green was in that latter situation it'd seem to me to be an ethical minefield.

All the best and I hope you get a positive resolution very soon.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 12:32 pm  

Would liquidation be the disaster everyone seems to think? We would reform under new owners and get Green out of the way.
Okay we would start at the bottom but Rangers got back to the Scots premier inside five years.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 12:34 pm  

andycapp wrote:

Would liquidation be the disaster everyone seems to think? We would reform under new owners and get Green out of the way.
Okay we would start at the bottom but Rangers got back to the Scots premier inside five years.

Rangers had money backers, big name sponsors and a huge fan base. It's like comparing Barcelona when suggesting we should try and be run by the fans because they manage it.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 12:39 pm  

andycapp wrote:

Would liquidation be the disaster everyone seems to think? We would reform under new owners and get Green out of the way.
Okay we would start at the bottom but Rangers got back to the Scots premier inside five years.

Rangers had a 50k supporter base and wasn't their third administration. This supporter base has been burned and robbed too many times.

We're 5 weeks from the new season and we wouldn't have a player to our name, no board and no ground. At best we would reform under fan ownership in a years time playing at BPA. In that time i'd expect most will have found something else to do on Sundays.

I've said it before and i'll say it again. Rugby league will be dead in Bradford. The amateur clubs will slowly start to go under due to not having enough juniors/players as no one will choose to take up RL due to not getting hooked by being taken to Bulls games by their parents/grandparents as most kids do.

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 12:46 pm  

Liquidation would surely mean the new Bradford RL club (assuming someone took on the challenge) would now miss the 2017 season?

Plus, speaking personally, as I don't live anywhere near Bradford anymore its the shared history, memories and personal investment (from 4 generations of my family) that makes me a Bulls fan - an entirely new club wouldn't have that link so I'm not sure what I'd be following, so Im not sure I would.

Hope I don't have to make that decision...

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:06 pm  

Thought I'd lend my support and help you reach 400 pages
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Good luck

Ill check back in when it hits 399

Re: Administration 3 - now in technicolour : Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:10 pm  

There's a fax fan on Twitter doing a parody of Gledhill which I must admit is keeping my spirits up a bit. It my not be the funniest material, and I don't follow either Gled or the parody, but I keep seeing retweets that are so close to accurate that you have to double check to see if it's the real or the fake. Parody Account

There's a fax fan on Twitter doing a parody of Gledhill which I must admit is keeping my spirits up a bit. It my not be the funniest material, and I don't follow either Gled or the parody, but I keep seeing retweets that are so close to accurate that you have to double check to see if it's the real or the fake. Parody Account