Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:56 am  

Which previous directors? The previous directors or the previous previous directors, or both?

Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:09 am  

Bulls4Champs wrote:

Which previous directors? The previous directors or the previous previous directors, or both?

Both!... if what one hears out in ether is correct!

Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:00 am  

anarkik wrote:

In a 'surprise' move he was also talking to the previous Directors, wonder who that could have been....

No surprise to me. Whether its Mumtaz or Akbhar they are going to need some 'rugby people' to actually run the club. They are only interested in the Coral Stand and the possibilities there - none of them know anything about how to run a SL operation. That's where the previous lot come in.....

Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:25 am  

paulwalker71 wrote:

No surprise to me. Whether its Mumtaz or Akbhar they are going to need some 'rugby people' to actually run the club. They are only interested in the Coral Stand and the possibilities there - none of them know anything about how to run a SL operation. That's where the previous lot come in.....

Interesting - the potential investors don't have a RL background - so they are looking for some of our previous directors to help with the rugby side. Have they been on another planet for a while - asking our ex-directors for advice on running a club - they have got to be joking!!!!!

Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:26 am  

Blotto wrote:

- none of them know anything about how to run a SL operation. That's where the previous lot come in.....

erm .............. you were joking yeah?

Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:29 am  

paulwalker71 wrote:

No surprise to me. Whether its Mumtaz or Akbhar they are going to need some 'rugby people' to actually run the club. They are only interested in the Coral Stand and the possibilities there - none of them know anything about how to run a SL operation. That's where the previous lot come in.....

Oh good because if there's one thing the previous lot (and previous previous lot) have shown is that they really know how to run a rugby operation. That's a real relief...

Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:45 am  

paulwalker71 wrote:

No surprise to me. Whether its Mumtaz or Akbhar they are going to need some 'rugby people' to actually run the club. They are only interested in the Coral Stand and the possibilities there - none of them know anything about how to run a SL operation. That's where the previous lot come in.....

neither did AG at Wakefield but hes made a very good fist of it compared to people who believe they can run a SL club, good business men will sort out the Bulls.

Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:54 am  

A fresh pair of eyes might be the very thing thats needed. These people are astute business people. They will need someone with RL experience, but they won't just let somebody continue on in the same old Kamikaze ways of the past.

Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:14 am  

At the moment we dont need rugby people, we need business people! Let's secure the club first, then build it as a business!

Re: INTERESTED PARTY : Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:16 am  

paulwalker71 wrote:

No surprise to me. Whether its Mumtaz or Akbhar they are going to need some 'rugby people' to actually run the club. They are only interested in the Coral Stand and the possibilities there - none of them know anything about how to run a SL operation. That's where the previous lot come in.....

They won't feel out of place there then.