Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:24 pm  

Pryce is a centre for sure. Like I say above, we have two handy wingers IMO for next year in Ainscough and Raynor.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:28 pm  

AaronBull wrote:

Pryce is a centre for sure. Like I say above, we have two handy wingers IMO for next year in Ainscough and Raynor.

I disagree, he doesn't have the agility, ball handling skills or defense to be a centre. He's a big winger and nothing more. Like you, I'd like to see Raynor and Ainscough as our starting wingers next year, unless we can replace Ah Van with a quality overseas player.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:31 pm  

Nothus wrote:

I disagree, he doesn't have the agility, ball handling skills or defense to be a centre. He's a big winger and nothing more.

His performances at Odsal and the Stoop this year would contradict that, 5 tries in 2 games!

Nothus wrote:

unless we can replace Ah Van with a quality overseas player.

Don't worry about a quota spot. Replace him with anyone. Him out and Pryce in improves our backline IMO.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:33 pm  

AaronBull wrote:

His performances at Odsal and the Stoop this year would contradict that, 5 tries in 2 games!

Don't worry about a quota spot. Replace him with anyone. Him out and Pryce in improves our backline IMO.

Wasn't Pryce on the wing when he scored those tries?
Even if he wasn't, it was Chev Walker opposite him, and the less said about that, the better!

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:42 pm  

1. Kearney
2. Pryce
3. Whitehead
4. Lulia
5. Ainscough

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 3:41 pm  

Before your game last night they showed the highlights from Fridays game.

Pryce looked truly awful, allover the place defensively, watch it and see for yourself.

You should be aiming for better, Raynor and Ainscough are much better wingers than Pryce.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 7:49 pm  

Looks like a split decision on the K Pryce front then . . . although if you read the Warriors board / do a search for KP, there are a large number of "interesting" reads to be found . . . . depending on your own point of view, of course

As for the "And, for what it's worth, anyone slating Karl Pryce is bang out of order" Chill. It's all just opinion . . . . . and anyone slating anyone for slating KP is, IMHO, bang out of order

I do recall him doing the longest goal line drop I've ever seen in thirty odd years or so of watching the Bulls/Northern. Can't recall who we were playing . . . but he kicked the ball from under the sticks at thr Rooley Lane end and it landed just before twenty five yard line . . . and then rolled a bit. Truely awesome kick. <see I don't dislike him - I just don't believe he is the answer>

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 7:55 pm  

AaronBull wrote:

I know something you don't know.. [/Paul124897 mode]

And, for what it's worth, anyone slating Karl Pryce is bang out of order. To question his heart and effort is appalling, his try scoring record stands up against anyones.

Are you saying you'd rather have Haha Van over KP? Dross. I'd be much happier with a backline of:

Ainscough - Lulia - Pryce - Raynor

than:

Crookes - Haha Van - Platt - Raynor

Excellent - I know nothing about KP. The above was me giving a reason why he may have been there.

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:17 pm  

Guilty by association

Re: Bulls rumour thread for 2012 season. : Sun Jul 03, 2011 10:08 pm  

Depressing stuff on here. Folk wanting to see KP back at the Bulls because he might actually be an improvement on Ah Van. Going to be a long time before we're worrying the top teams if we're relying on the likes of KP.

Jeez.