Would they not be better waiting until taking control, before explaining to the masses what their intentions are? Or am I missing something here.. isn't there a bidding process to go through first with the RFL?
If there was a market for it I'd put a quid on lamb and Irvine getting control by next week.
All the other talk of players, coaches, points deductions, leagues etc, whilst obvious points for discussions are all pretty irrelevant to me at the mo. We have no players, no ground and no league, and we won't have any meaningful discussion about any of that until we get some new owners of some sort of new Bradford rl club. That's the only news that counts for me at the mo, who will take it on? And in what form? -as that will be the first indicator for me as to if I want to commit to another go on the roller-coaster or I tap out with the old club I followed. And for that I'm back in waiting for announcement mode......#sigh#
if this was a normal business, well you would have gone bust and honestly only the employees and their family and friends would have cared, but it's not, but it still should be treated as a business going forward with a five year then ten year plan slowly building good foundations,your youth setup is your 'crown jewel' let that go at your peril, all supporters want success, but i honestly believe for you to get back to where you belong will be a long journey minimum five years, but without your youth setup, it really will be a distant dream and doomed to failure over the long term, Saints Wigan Leeds to an extent are all reaping the rewards for ploughing in money to their youth setups.
Apologies if I'm mistaken , I was under the impression the 500 K ' secret ' loan never got returned , and that the lease deal was collateral for its eventual repayment , strange I know , but how it seemed to me , happy to be educated if I'm wrong
If the club is to move forward then Rohan needs to take a drastic paycut. You simply cannot be paying Super League coach salaries in the Championship. My son will tell that.
Short term survival and then you can steady the ship is better than run a youth academy and go bust. It's said a youth set up cost about 200k per year. Richard Lamb seem to share the view that a competitive first team is the starting point.
You need to cut whatever you can. So instead of dissecting each persons points saying how terrible they are what do you suggest the model should look like with very limited funds?
There isn't one. My own totally pessimistic view is that what we've heard so far will not produce any setup even remotely worthy of the Bulls name. In the absence of an owner willing and able to put in substantial money, my own view is that the whole thing is dead in the water, at least as a recognizable Bradford club.
It seems to me that what few hints are emerging as to what lamb or whoever may have in mind will be something completely different, and it seems to me that that something will be committing suicide by taking the directive to start in the Championship.
Nothing has changed. If you want a Bulls-style big city team, then you always did, and always will, need a big money backer. What is being proposed amounts to nothing, it would leave the club that used to be Bradford in a much, much worse place than the club that used to once be the mighty Bradford Park Avenue. Same name, but no point. And they (allegedly) DO have a man with money involved.
if this was a normal business, well you would have gone bust and honestly only the employees and their family and friends would have cared, but it's not, but it still should be treated as a business going forward with a five year then ten year plan slowly building good foundations,your youth setup is your 'crown jewel' let that go at your peril, all supporters want success, but i honestly believe for you to get back to where you belong will be a long journey minimum five years, but without your youth setup, it really will be a distant dream and doomed to failure over the long term, Saints Wigan Leeds to an extent are all reaping the rewards for ploughing in money to their youth setups.
Saints , Wigan and Leeds can retain their products , Bradford couldn't retain them when they were in SL , they certainly won't be able to retain them in the Championship or C1
Seriously an academy is pointless outside SL to any club , especially one that is essentially ' potless '
Yes, he's on Nil. Not been paid since November. Looks like the youth setup has already gone, and losing that "to focus funds on the first team" would be about the maddest idea yet, and the one thing above all else that every remaining Bradford fan would not have wanted.
Yes, a new business can't get any.
that is nuts, with respect. How does eking out "short term survival" ever achieve anything? Why would a team that "short term survived" (how??) for a season or two suddenly become more able to look to the longer term future? If it doesn't work from Day 1 it sure won't get any better on Day 2.
I think what Danny was saying is maybe we concentrate all available funding it to making sure we survive in the championship this season. A £100,00 on the academy may be better spend on trying to survive in the championship and then build from there. I'm the biggest advocate of the academy But we've put hundreds of thousands of pounds into the juniors only for other clubs to now benefit. Also i don't think we'll be able to field an academy this year. You've also got to remember it will now take years to gain back the trust of parents when trying to sign junior players. I'd like to see a few academy players as part of our squad though. Hopefully some will. First we need a squad and then see what's left over.
Lamb doesn't flll me with any confidence but one man that does is Damian Irvine. The Cronulla fans worship him and many appointed their GF victory to what he did in their bad times.
Right after reading what feels like 100s and 100s of posts, there's something I'm not quite clear on....
what EXACTLY has been liquidated? Is it the holding company AND the club (since the club - with its name, logo, branding etc is a separate distinguishable entity) or is it just the holding company?
Are we now awaiting the creation of a brand new club, with a new name, logo and branding - or are we just waiting for a new holding company to come along and continue with the existing club name, logo and branding?
Last edited by Bullmans Parade on Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
FA I'm starting to understand you and feel sorry for how you feel genuinely, however the vision you have isn't realistic, times have sadly changed for the Bulls. They are no more and the new club will be different, most team have ditched youth set ups other than the "big" team as developing players at a cost who leave is a wasted overhead.
GUBRATS makes this point correctly. Support the new club back what they are and lesson your expectations. 3 years without admin would be a great start with at team still to support.