Re: The next eight games : Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

it can be done. Only real challenge is saints

You are a funny guy

Re: The next eight games : Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:47 pm  

SimonBarrett wrote:

Really!!?? Did you not go to the game, or see the result from Monday!???????? Remind me again who you play in Scotland!???

Some people need to wake up and realise that this game is played on the park and not on paper!!!!

We lost by 2 points. We dropped a lot of ball and missed a conversion. Wakefield hardly did a demolishion job on us?

Re: The next eight games : Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:24 pm  

SimonBarrett wrote:

Really!!?? Did you not go to the game, or see the result from Monday!???????? Remind me again who you play in Scotland!???

Some people need to wake up and realise that this game is played on the park and not on paper!!!!

What about smelling the coffee??? Did you forget the coffee????????

Re: The next eight games : Tue Apr 14, 2009 5:32 pm  

Mick Gledhill wrote:

I agree.

I expect two points Friday

And you will and it will be a certainty if Briers doesn't play, which looks very likely.

Re: The next eight games : Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:16 am  

Roofaldo wrote:

We lost by 2 points. We dropped a lot of ball and missed a conversion. Wakefield hardly did a demolishion job on us?

When did l say we demolished you??? But we did beat you, and we also dropped a lot of ball and did not play particularly well! Or do you disagree and think that was the best we can offer!!!!???

Re: The next eight games : Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:17 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

What about smelling the coffee??? Did you forget the coffee????????

Dont like coffee!

Re: The next eight games : Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:31 am  

SimonBarrett wrote:

When did l say we demolished you??? But we did beat you, and we also dropped a lot of ball and did not play particularly well! Or do you disagree and think that was the best we can offer!!!!???

What a stupid proposition!

Yes, during that 80 minutes, that was the absolute best you could offer. Absolutely it was. Isn't that a bleedin' obvious point?

Unless you are contradicting yourself and maintaining an argument that "on paper" you can play a lot better?

What difference does it, or would it, make if it were true that, at other times, in other places, you were indeed able to play better? That was the best you could do against us. What you, or we, or anyone "can offer" next week, next month or next year is just totally irrelevant.

Really, no-one cares what you "can offer", but if you want to use your theory as some emotional crutch well hey, go right ahead!

Re: The next eight games : Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:44 am  

Roofaldo wrote:

We lost by 2 points. We dropped a lot of ball and missed a conversion. Wakefield hardly did a demolishion job on us?

no but they did enough to stay in the top 4, must really pain you 4 west yorkshire sides in the top 5 and bradford not even in the 8

Re: The next eight games : Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:51 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

What a stupid proposition!

Yes, during that 80 minutes, that was the absolute best you could offer. Absolutely it was. Isn't that a bleedin' obvious point?

Unless you are contradicting yourself and maintaining an argument that "on paper" you can play a lot better?

What difference does it, or would it, make if it were true that, at other times, in other places, you were indeed able to play better? That was the best you could do against us. What you, or we, or anyone "can offer" next week, next month or next year is just totally irrelevant.

Really, no-one cares what you "can offer", but if you want to use your theory as some emotional crutch well hey, go right ahead!

of course it was the best we could offer which was better than you could offer on the day . we know we are just a tiny little club who like Huddersfield don't deserve to be in the top 4 . Of course Leeds , saints , wigan and the mighty bulls deserve that . unfortunately though you get 2 points for a SL win and F'all if you lose so i guess the predicament you are in is all down to those t@@ts at red hall .

on 2nd thoughts maybe the reason you can not smell the coffee is the strong presence of bullsh/t.

i guess you could call nobby and glass jaw king rats as they jumped when the good ship odd soul first sprouted a leak .

see you in edingbrough i will the fella wearing a big smile.

Re: The next eight games : Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:05 am  

mutley cat wrote:

of course it was the best we could offer which was better than you could offer on the day .

Correct so far, if banal.

mutley cat wrote:

we know we are just a tiny little club who like Huddersfield don't deserve to be in the top 4 . Of course Leeds , saints , wigan and the mighty bulls deserve that .

Awww, such a pathetic, self-pitying inferiority complex. Shame you seem to know zero of the history of your club though.

mutley cat wrote:

unfortunately though you get 2 points for a SL win and F'all if you lose

Really?

No, this can't be true.

I wonder if anyone has told the Bulls about this? When did it come in?

mutley cat wrote:

so i guess the predicament you are in is all down to those t@@ts at red hall .

It is? What is this predicament? And what is it to do with them?

mutley cat wrote:

on 2nd thoughts maybe the reason you can not smell the coffee is the strong presence of bullsh/t.

What coffee is this, and why can't I smell it? In English, if you can.

mutley cat wrote:

i guess you could call nobby and glass jaw king rats as they jumped when the good ship odd soul first sprouted a leak .

Odd soul? Glass jaw? WTF is this to do with anything? Are you having one of those "random speak" brainstorm sessions, fuelled by hallucinogenics, perhaps?

mutley cat wrote:

see you in edingbrough i will the fella wearing a big smile.

You will, will you? You will what, though? And more to the point, will he let you?

And where's edingbrough?