: Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:14 pm  

Dont worry he is off to Wakey next year.

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:30 pm  

BOYD2 wrote:

Dont worry he is off to Wakey next year.

I'm not, as long as we bring someone in of reasonable quality. He used to among the top few hookers in SL, he has dropped well down the order nowadays I'm afraid. Do you need a goal kicker too?

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:05 pm  

Bully_Boxer wrote:

I'm not, as long as we bring someone in of reasonable quality. He used to among the top few hookers in SL, he has dropped well down the order nowadays I'm afraid. Do you need a goal kicker too?

I'd be worried. There's no-one the Bulls can recruit that will be as good as Newton. Especially with the influence he has on the field.

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:18 pm  

AaronBull wrote:

I'd be worried. There's no-one the Bulls can recruit that will be as good as Newton. Especially with the influence he has on the field.

Julien Rinaldi

: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:35 am  

AaronBull wrote:

I'd be worried. There's no-one the Bulls can recruit that will be as good as Newton. Especially with the influence he has on the field.

I think you and I must be watching different players.

Re: Newton : Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:05 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

You quoted my post, yet I did neither of those things. All I did was state that the Bulls crowd was dreadful - which by any historic objective measure, including particularly the impact on the club's cash flow (remember what Hood said at the Fans' Forum...?) it was.

And that was only in response to a suggestion that the crowd was much larger than reported.

Yep, you did indeed say that the crowd was "dreadful". I was part of that crowd and I do not consider myself to be "dreadful" nor in fact do I think that the vast majority were in any way "dreadful".

Worryingly low in numbers maybe, but each and everyone who was there wanted to be there.

Sorry to be a pedant, but you appear to have form for it.

Re: Newton : Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:25 pm  

The-original-&-best-V wrote:

Yep, you did indeed say that the crowd was "dreadful". I was part of that crowd and I do not consider myself to be "dreadful" nor in fact do I think that the vast majority were in any way "dreadful".

Worryingly low in numbers maybe, but each and everyone who was there wanted to be there.

Sorry to be a pedant, but you appear to have form for it.

I was referring to the size of the crowd. Surely that should have been bloody obvious given the context of my original post, and certainly from my reply to yours? And I'll thank you not to throw cheap insults at me.

Re: Newton : Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:33 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

I was referring to the size of the crowd. Surely that should have been bloody obvious given the context of my original post, and certainly from my reply to yours? And I'll thank you not to throw cheap insults at me.

Didn't take you long did it?

Looking for cyber aggro were you?

Eloquent as you may be and intelligent as you think you are, you and your band of merry men are one of the reasons that there are now merely a few hardcore people who even dare question your opinion and hence even post anything at all in fear of incuuring your ever widening wrath and ire toward your fellows.

You may say what you wish to me. I may respond in a few minutes, an hour or two, days, or maybe not at all. you really don't fuss me all that much.

What is clear to me is that you consider this forum your own domain to deride, mock and even belittle anyone who even may consider questioning or challenging your writings. After all the gospel according to Adey is the one true gospel eh?

Re: Newton : Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:39 pm  

The-original-&-best-V wrote:

Didn't take you long did it?

Looking for cyber aggro were you?

Eloquent as you may be and intelligent as you think you are, you and your band of merry men are one of the reasons that there are now merely a few hardcore people who even dare question your opinion and hence even post anything at all in fear of incuuring your ever widening wrath and ire toward your fellows.

You may say what you wish to me. I may respond in a few minutes, an hour or two, days, or maybe not at all. you really don't fuss me all that much.

What is clear to me is that you consider this forum your own domain to deride, mock and even belittle anyone who even may consider questioning or challenging your writings. After all the gospel according to Adey is the one true gospel eh?

Re: Newton : Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:44 pm  

The-original-&-best-V wrote:

Didn't take you long did it?

Looking for cyber aggro were you?

Eloquent as you may be and intelligent as you think you are, you and your band of merry men are one of the reasons that there are now merely a few hardcore people who even dare question your opinion and hence even post anything at all in fear of incuuring your ever widening wrath and ire toward your fellows.

You may say what you wish to me. I may respond in a few minutes, an hour or two, days, or maybe not at all. you really don't fuss me all that much.

What is clear to me is that you consider this forum your own domain to deride, mock and even belittle anyone who even may consider questioning or challenging your writings. After all the gospel according to Adey is the one true gospel eh?

Hardly - but its clear YOU were.

What the hell have I done to warrant that tirade of garbage from you? I have anyway hardly posted on here for several weeks. Something has clearly rattled your cage big-time, but if that is your attitude you can go to hell.