The present ownership (if they do own it; so far as we can tell they are on some sort of conditional semi-official trial period unless-someone-better-ciomes-along weirdo basis) are certainly not bound by the agreement into which OK was bounced for two years of half distribution. So - another "known unknown" to add: will one condition (whoever ends up owning the Bulls) be the same 2 year half money period? I mean, IF it was right that one price of admin was 2 years on half money, which seems to have been a ryule created for us, then surely, having gone into admin again, the new incarnation would logically have to agree to start a new 2 year half money period? I mean, i see no logic in them agreeing to "honour" the arrse end of the old club's 2 year half-pay deal, and then moving up to full pay. And how could the RFL justify what they did to OKB if they don't do the same for others who follow into admin? (at any club, of course).
But, the catch may be that the RFL would be (well, in my opinion) unlikely to find many more businessmen who would agree to such a draconian and manifestly unfair proviso. If it was me, (I wish!) there is not a cat in hell's chance that I would.
