: Mon May 18, 2009 3:11 pm  

Wigan Bull wrote:

Modern facilities, covered viewing.

Is it bringing that though there isn't any finalised plans.

: Mon May 18, 2009 3:17 pm  

redeverready wrote:

Is it bringing that though there isn't any finalised plans.

Is it me or does that not make sense?

: Mon May 18, 2009 3:27 pm  

Wigan Bull wrote:

Is it me or does that not make sense?

Eats, shoots and leaves

: Mon May 18, 2009 3:40 pm  

Wigan Bull wrote:

Is it me or does that not make sense?

No it's not you. The point i tried to make was are the benefits set in stone as there doesn't seem to be any final plans.

: Mon May 18, 2009 3:42 pm  

af wrote:

Retospective stadium naming rights?

It's the official Leeds site, what do you expect, accurate statistics?

Has anyone yet placed yesterday's attendance in the Bulls 'Hall Of Infamy'

As the SL regular rounds go, how near the foot of the table has it come?

Bottom five, bottom three?

There was some concern expressed on here by respected forum members earlier in the season. Have their fears (re the crowd) being realised?

[Bullseye]

: Mon May 18, 2009 4:52 pm  

Well it must be in the bottom 5 somewhere I reckon.

: Mon May 18, 2009 5:31 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

Well it must be in the bottom 5 somewhere I reckon.

I must admit I had you in mind, not that I respect you or anything (except when you're in a Leeds shirt obviously )

I have a 6,863 for a Bradford V London in 1998
I have a 7,192 for a Bradford V London in 1996
I now have a 7,602 for Bradford V Celtic in 2009

I just wondered if a Bradford 'stato' had any more?

Still a way to go to meet Leeds' very own low point in the SL regular rounds, so they'll be no gloating from me.

: Mon May 18, 2009 6:34 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

OTOH here we have a concerned mastermind. He can work out that if the Bulls get 7K each home gate, that would be less than they used to get. Well, fsckin'ell, we should bow down in the presence of the God of the Bleedin' Obvious. And he "would start to worry if he was (sic) us". There's not a lot to be thankful for, but certainly one small mercy is that we're NOT you, and you're NOT us. For which we will remain forever grateful to any god there may be.

So what's your argument with what i said?
It's no good going La-la-la-i can't hear you
The bulls are in the 5hit big time,the money clearly isn't coming through the turnstiles,but hey maybe your right and i'm wrong here

: Mon May 18, 2009 7:02 pm  

Oh and you really have the record SL attendance under your belt this season.

: Mon May 18, 2009 8:13 pm  

tvoc wrote:

I must admit I had you in mind, not that I respect you or anything (except when you're in a Leeds shirt obviously )

I have a 6,863 for a Bradford V London in 1998
I have a 7,192 for a Bradford V London in 1996
I now have a 7,602 for Bradford V Celtic in 2009

I just wondered if a Bradford 'stato' had any more?

Still a way to go to meet Leeds' very own low point in the SL regular rounds, so they'll be no gloating from me.

The London game in 1998 is the fixture at Tynecastle and is actually a London home game.

These are Bradford's ten lowest crowds in super league

1) 7192 v London 8.04.96
2) 7602 v Celtic 17.05.09
3) 8288 v Wakefield 12.07.02 VP
4) 8346 v Catalans 8.06.08
5) 8359 v Sheffield 23.06.96
6) 8428 v Harlequins 24.03.08
7) 8643 v Warrington 17.04.09
8 ) 8650 v Workington 2.06.96
9) 8965 v London 7.06.02 VP
10) 9181 v Hull FC 17.08.08

These are the remaining gates below 10k

9216 v London 7.06.02
9316 v Castleford 26.07.02 VP
9350 v Catalans 9.09.07
9429 v Wakefield 20.07.08
9451 v Wakefield 8.09.06
9511 v Hull FC 22.06.08
9652 v Salford 29.04.02 VP
9663 v Warrington 2.05.07 VP
9741 v Hull KR 29.06.08
9849 v Oldham 28.07.96