[Pumpetypump]

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:27 pm  

With gloating trolls such as kinley who has unsuccessfully tried to mask his rabies with the thinnest veneer of sense, I know which club I personally "despise".

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:34 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

With gloating trolls such as kinley who has unsuccessfully tried to mask his rabies with the thinnest veneer of sense, I know which club I personally "despise".

To be fair all clubs have idiots. Wakefield have a few thy have come out of the wood work, snowie, tamaragrace , Wakey til I die, when I read their posts my blood boils.

Then you read posts from one or two bulls posters that just leaves you embarrased!

[Frosties.]

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:44 pm  

Scruton to Wakefield the next twist in the tale?

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:49 pm  

And as ever the point is well and truly missed, although I'm beginning to thing it is being done purposefully.
You used to have my sympathy...but alas that has now dried up.

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:58 pm  

Frosties. wrote:

Scruton to Wakefield the next twist in the tale?

Something that I've heard but I am not in the know.
I think RHP 'update' may be regarding this and others departure?
I am a rugby league fan and I would like Bradford to remain in SL (Just putting it out their as I may be classed as a 'troll')
P.S I think kinley was aiming his post towards your board not the fans, we have all been in the same boat before. Fans can only do limited amounts.

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:15 pm  

The Dreadnought wrote:

P.S I think kinley was aiming his post towards your board not the fans, we have all been in the same boat before. Fans can only do limited amounts.

It didn't read like that. It read like someone without theballs to say "I hate Bradford and am delighted". He or she can always clear it up.

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:21 pm  

financialtimes wrote: but the £500k you raised wasn't used to pay off debts, it was used to clear directors liabilities so that those that got you in to the mess originally walked away with their houses in tact When you went in to admin (before OK took over) you still had debts, so the £500k you raised didn't save you from admin, it saved your directors from being homeless It really is getting tiresome now, running you out of town whenever you appear with your usual crap. I dealt with the above here.. Our readers will note that you and others seemed unable to answer the points, so instead did the usual and resorted to derision. I did the same a week ago, when you went on the VT spouting garbage about TUPE. And demonstrated you actually did not really understand it at all. Although don't just take my word for it. You were told unequivocally you were wrong by Bullnorthern, who actually knows more about TUPE than you - or I, or quite possibly anyone else on this forum.

financialtimes wrote: but the £500k you raised wasn't used to pay off debts, it was used to clear directors liabilities so that those that got you in to the mess originally walked away with their houses in tact When you went in to admin (before OK took over) you still had debts, so the £500k you raised didn't save you from admin, it saved your directors from being homeless It really is getting tiresome now, running you out of town whenever you appear with your usual crap. I dealt with the above here.. Our readers will note that you and others seemed unable to answer the points, so instead did the usual and resorted to derision. I did the same a week ago, when you went on the VT spouting garbage about TUPE. And demonstrated you actually did not really understand it at all. Although don't just take my word for it. You were told unequivocally you were wrong by Bullnorthern, who actually knows more about TUPE than you - or I, or quite possibly anyone else on this forum.

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:36 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

With gloating trolls such as kinley who has unsuccessfully tried to mask his rabies with the thinnest veneer of sense, I know which club I personally "despise".

Not gloating at all I just think you have taken the soft option and when you cry foul it seems hypocritical, that's all.

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:40 pm  

M@islebugs wrote:

You're missing point, Kinley Cat, "knows a fair bit about maning up, taking our medicine, and doing the right thing".

What he/she actually means is I 'know a fair bit about standing to one side while Glover, then Carter pick up the tab and rescue my club."

Who, apart from Glover, has the right to come on here and act righteously? It's trolling without the wit to know it.

Glover was very much the knight in White when we went bust however his financial shortfalls left us in just as much of a mess later on. Certainly Carter has done a fantastic job and when he said we would have to cut our cloth accordingly we all backed him, apart from one prominent forum member, it certainly hasn't been easy, we have all had a lot of medicine.
1/10 for perception 10/10 for missing the point.

Re: Next bizarre twist : Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:51 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

Not gloating at all I just think you have taken the soft option and when you cry foul it seems hypocritical, that's all.

Having £1.3m Sky money confiscated - contributing in a very big way to the latest problems - is hardly taking the soft option.

Had you lot been faced with that penalty, I expect it would have been oblivion for you.

And a considerable number of Trinity supporters are doing a pretty fine job of looking like gloaters, dripping with schadenfreude - or, at best, making it clear that seeing the Bulls wrecked OFF the park can only help your club survive in SL ON it - on these and other forums.