Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
Now you can try to ramp up your ludicrous case by trying to define your newly introduced phrase "REAL TOP" players
My newly introduced phrase?
Strangely........
Ferocious Aardvark earlier wrote: How many more top players - real top players - like Morrison, Menzies and Hall
Oh dear!
You get into an argument about semantics now if that's what you want, in your typical attempt to present yourself as having "won" your self-decreed "argument", but anyone who would claim that Morrison (over 200 NRL games scoring over 60 tries, selected for Country Origin in 2001, 2003, 2004 and 2005) or Hall (current NRL Grand Final winner, WCC winner) are outside the category of top class signings, must surely be on the wind-up.
Good signings they are indeed, but you claimed that they were "real top players" which is silly.
You probably don't actually even know that for the second half of last season, Hall was mostly keeping Menzies on the bench? (Or is Menzies second rate too in your gaga opinion?)
As it was widely accepted that Menzies was not neccessarily up to 80 minutes of RL in the NRL each week then why would I not know that? I suppose you think that Hall would have kept a Menzies in his prime on the bench?
However, as usual there are more than my dissenting voices against your stupid opinion but guess whose one you concentrate on the most?
Your obsession is touching however.
)...what is your definition of a "REAL TOP CLASS" signing?
). And both FA and ME contribute to that, even though there is some repitition on occasions.
