[Bulliac]

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:11 pm  

You couldn't make it up.........

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:13 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

The muppets at BBH in 2002 listed those two items under the names of those who billed them (York House were the builders...) not under what the asset actually was. Wassocks.

So do we now own a builders company?

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:22 pm  

daveyz999 wrote:

So do we now own a builders company?

Probably more likely that we owe a builder's company...

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:28 pm  

debaser wrote:

Probably more likely that we owe a builder's company...

[Bullseye]

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 5:40 pm  

debaser wrote:

Probably more likely that we owe a builder's company...

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:17 pm  

Lamb has just Tweeted that he has made a bid.

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:56 pm  

Rumour has it and not sure how accurate that Mr Lamb has no money himself but is actually in a consortium with one of the members being the one and only Omar Khan

Make of that what you will

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:09 pm  

I think Mr Caisley would be more believable

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:11 pm  

I'd rather have the Cookie Monster, rumour going round the WWE is trying to buy Newcastle, surely they would rather have an RL instead of the football rubbish.

Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:33 pm  

Not been appointed hasn't Lamb chop.