Godwin also ahead of schedule : Sat May 30, 2009 11:19 am  

Aswell as Morro More good news . Once Godwin is 100% we could give Rinaldi a shot at SO and put Jeffries at SH, or possibly other way round.

Aswell as Morro More good news . Once Godwin is 100% we could give Rinaldi a shot at SO and put Jeffries at SH, or possibly other way round.

Re: Godwin also ahead of schedule : Sat May 30, 2009 11:52 am  

Ewwenorfolk wrote: Aswell as Morro More good news . Once Godwin is 100% we could give Rinaldi a shot at SO and put Jeffries at SH, or possibly other way round. As much as most fans would like to see Deacon left out based on current form, we all know it won't happen. Once Godwin is back, Rinaldi will most likely leave the club.

Ewwenorfolk wrote: Aswell as Morro More good news . Once Godwin is 100% we could give Rinaldi a shot at SO and put Jeffries at SH, or possibly other way round. As much as most fans would like to see Deacon left out based on current form, we all know it won't happen. Once Godwin is back, Rinaldi will most likely leave the club.

: Sat May 30, 2009 12:25 pm  

Cant we keep rinaldi and get rid of godwin..never done owt for us yet.

: Sat May 30, 2009 12:40 pm  

ritz wrote:

Cant we keep rinaldi and get rid of godwin..never done owt for us yet.

Hull KR last year? Getting whooped, Godwin came on and completely turned the game around. Won Man Of The Match too I believe.

: Sat May 30, 2009 12:40 pm  

ritz wrote:

Cant we keep rinaldi and get rid of godwin..never done owt for us yet.

Sadly no, as Godwin was another who was handed out a bemusing three year contract without doing much at all to justify it.

(now don't get me completely wrong - I think Godwin is half decent but he has not played enough for us since he came as he seems a bit injury prone.)

: Sat May 30, 2009 1:49 pm  

mystic eddie wrote:

Sadly no, as Godwin was another who was handed out a bemusing three year contract without doing much at all to justify it.

(now don't get me completely wrong - I think Godwin is half decent but he has not played enough for us since he came as he seems a bit injury prone.)

He was all set to sign for cas on a two year deal, which is why bulls had to offer him a three year deal to retain his services.

: Sat May 30, 2009 2:48 pm  

pyeman wrote:

He was all set to sign for cas on a two year deal, which is why bulls had to offer him a three year deal to retain his services.

That is fair enough but it is just whether his services were worth retaining that I am unsure of.

: Sat May 30, 2009 3:32 pm  

pyeman wrote:

He was all set to sign for cas on a two year deal, which is why bulls had to offer him a three year deal to retain his services.

Should have let him go then no way is he worth 3 yr deal..hes never been more than a backup hooker in his career and dont see that changing, would have signed robbie paul back up before offering godwin 3 yrs.

Why didnt we look to lower leagues and sign shaun lunt, looks miles better than godwin ever will.

: Sat May 30, 2009 8:33 pm  

ritz wrote:

Should have let him go then no way is he worth 3 yr deal..hes never been more than a backup hooker in his career and dont see that changing, would have signed robbie paul back up before offering godwin 3 yrs.

Why didnt we look to lower leagues and sign shaun lunt, looks miles better than godwin ever will.

We actualy let lunt leave our academy! and for what its worth i think godwin is a good hooker, even if you dont think he's a super star has he ever really let you down?