Jamie Langley : Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:20 pm  

Time for him to move into the front row? IMO Sam Burgess is by far the better backrower out of the pair, as proven on saturday night.
Langley would make a better impact prop. His ball handling looks awkward because of his size, and his footwork looks clumsy. Although he would have to up his work rate, but I think he could do that if he was used in spells.
Opinions?

Re: Jamie Langley : Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:23 pm  

beefy1 wrote:

Time for him to move into the front row? IMO Sam Burgess is by far the better backrower out of the pair, as proven on saturday night.
Langley would make a better impact prop. His ball handling looks awkward because of his size, and his footwork looks clumsy. Although he would have to up his work rate, but I think he could do that if he was used in spells.
Opinions?

You bring this up now he's finding form at LF? I don't think he'd have enough impact to be used at prop, after his performances V Wire and Wakey he deserves to retain his place, with Burgess in Second row then move Burgess TO LF with subs.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:31 pm  

Heard a rumour Langley is Cas bound as Bradford don't want to extend his contract, have any of you lot heard anything like that?

Re: Jamie Langley : Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:33 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

with Burgess in Second row then move Burgess TO LF with subs.

Some player this guy!

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:50 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Heard a rumour Langley is Cas bound as Bradford don't want to extend his contract, have any of you lot heard anything like that?

Doubt it considering he is under contract until the end of next season.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:51 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Heard a rumour Langley is Cas bound as Bradford don't want to extend his contract, have any of you lot heard anything like that?

According to rumours, our entire squad seems to be Cas bound!

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:52 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Heard a rumour Langley is Cas bound as Bradford don't want to extend his contract, have any of you lot heard anything like that?

Apparently every player at the Bulls is Cas bound this season.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:53 pm  

neilo86 wrote:

Doubt it considering he is under contract until the end of next season.

That puts that one to bed then

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:51 pm  

DILLIGAF wrote:

According to rumours, our entire squad seems to be Cas bound!

no wonder you've had such a crap season if you've only got langley and lynch in your squad

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:55 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Heard a rumour Langley is Cas bound as Bradford don't want to extend his contract, have any of you lot heard anything like that?

Yeah something really similar last week, 'Lynch is Cas bound'. That turned out to be a load of false hope aswell.