Salary cap to stay at 1.65 million : Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:09 pm  

http://www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=14430 The 50,000 10 year rule could be good for us. At least Deacon's cheaper on Salary cap than he would be.

http://www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=14430 The 50,000 10 year rule could be good for us. At least Deacon's cheaper on Salary cap than he would be.

Re: Salary cap to stay at 1.65 million : Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:14 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote: http://www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=14430 The 50,000 10 year rule could be good for us. At least Deacon's cheaper on Salary cap than he would be. Not so sure that's a good thing. Might encourage the club to keep him for even longer, which in current form, would NOT be good.

Ewwenorfolk wrote: http://www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=14430 The 50,000 10 year rule could be good for us. At least Deacon's cheaper on Salary cap than he would be. Not so sure that's a good thing. Might encourage the club to keep him for even longer, which in current form, would NOT be good.

Re: Salary cap to stay at 1.65 million : Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:32 pm  

DILLIGAF wrote:

Not so sure that's a good thing. Might encourage the club to keep him for even longer, which in current form, would NOT be good.

that rules been in for a couple of years. was reason we gave deacs 2 year deal last year.