GANSON : Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:33 am  

Has anyone else heard about this: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/gene ... 36038.html Drunk and disorderly tut tut.

Has anyone else heard about this: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/gene ... 36038.html Drunk and disorderly tut tut.

: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:36 am  

Could explain some of his decisions at times...

: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:39 am  

An interesting point further down the article that the first sending off in Superleague was at the weekend. How does that compare to previous seasons? What does it mean? Are there less serious infringements?

[Bulliac]

: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:09 am  

debaser wrote:

An interesting point further down the article that the first sending off in Superleague was at the weekend. How does that compare to previous seasons? What does it mean? Are there less serious infringements?

I don`t think the infringements have been less serious this season, nor do I think that there have been fewer of them. There have been quite a few which were as bad/worse than the one at Wigan on Friday and they only got the crossed arms. It seems to me that there must have been some decision by the referees not to send players off. Well Mr TV Ganson has broken it now so maybe it will be open season from now on?

Re: GANSON : Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:16 pm  

Richard_bull wrote: Has anyone else heard about this: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/gene ... 36038.html Drunk and disorderly tut tut. You forgot to mention the bit about it being strongly denied. And about him not being charged.

Richard_bull wrote: Has anyone else heard about this: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/gene ... 36038.html Drunk and disorderly tut tut. You forgot to mention the bit about it being strongly denied. And about him not being charged.

: Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:46 pm  

Why use solicitors? He should ask for a video replay.