Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:45 pm  

Ian P wrote:

I heard the torpedo ram into the side of the ship then




Can I lob in an exocet at this point

Jamie Peacock five visits to Red Hall in three years

Yeah, JP is an angel, ask Keith Mason, or Josh Perry

Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:44 pm  

one match ban plus £300 fine http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 21,00.html

one match ban plus £300 fine http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 21,00.html

Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:01 pm  

The Dirty fecker should have had a 12 match ban for me no place in RL for that act of thuggery?

AS for Hull they won't miss him as he does nothing anyway?

Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:08 pm  

Rommel wrote:

The Dirty fecker should have had a 12 match ban for me no place in RL for that act of thuggery?

AS for Hull they won't miss him as he does nothing anyway?

Tell me what Wellens did again on the same night.

How is the knacker grabber as well.

Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:55 pm  

shouldhave been at lease 3 game ban good luck to fc for resigning him for 2011

Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:48 pm  

Rommel wrote:

The Dirty fecker should have had a 12 match ban for me no place in RL for that act of thuggery?

AS for Hull they won't miss him as he does nothing anyway?

Irwin long time no see

Leave Radders alone just because his Grandad was in the 8th Army with Monty

Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:53 pm  

You are right Smokey JP got smacked by Perry and Mason.

Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:54 pm  

Rommel wrote:

The Dirty fecker should have had a 12 match ban for me no place in RL for that act of thuggery?

AS for Hull they won't miss him as he does nothing anyway?

agree with this dude.

Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:01 pm  

sheffield robin wrote:

agree with this dude.

15 posts in and still
sorry but you must be agreeing with Rommel thats a first for anyone

[Paul Thexton]

Re: Bailey-Radford...set aside your prejudices? : Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:47 am  

SmokeyTA wrote:

that would be the James Graham banned for two matches for a late high challenge on Rob Burrow? Maybe thats one of Grahams problems he can tend to get a bit bullied

Yep that would be the one. Graham was punished for his indiscretion though, a lot of Bailey's reviews on the RFL site say things like "unclear as to initial point of contact", such as the one on Riley in the Challenge Cup Final.