: Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:38 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

... The trolling effort is quite poor.

So, unlike Manly's efforts, par for the course.

[John_D]

Re: so much for the WCC meaning anything : Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:54 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

i wonder where the result leaves leeds

St Michaels Lane, LS6

: Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:59 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

so much for leeds being good enough to make the semis of the nrl.

lucky they can go back to SL and not have to play nrl teams each week.

Good job Melbourne weren't in the SL last year. Even Castleford could beat Leeds.

No more need to feed the troll on this one. He's already made himself look a fool on this one!

It's quite sad that you've resulted to becoming a troll as a replacement for starting debates you cannot win. You must be desperate for attention.

: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:07 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

Good job Melbourne weren't in the SL last year. Even Castleford could beat Leeds.

No more need to feed the troll on this one. He's already made himself look a fool on this one!

It's quite sad that you've resulted to becoming a troll as a replacement for starting debates you cannot win. You must be desperate for attention.

so basically you arent answering the question.

if you are interested in last years form, start a thread.

see if you can come up with an answer about something relevant to the thread title.

id say the manlys loss reflets quite poorly on leeds

: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:10 pm  

they were clearly knackered after the increase in speed and intensity of playing a super league team.

: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:11 pm  

Bighead wrote:

they were clearly knackered after the increase in speed and intensity of playing a super league team.

thats not bad.

: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:30 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

thats not bad.

Which is the same excuse Leeds came out with last year after getting stuffed by Castleford.

The point I've made is totally relevant to the point you're trying to make. Teams often lose after big intense games. It therefore doesn't reflect badly on Leeds. If it does, it therefore means that Melbourne losing to Leeds last year reflects badly on them because Cas beat Leeds. It is exactly the same situation but reversed.

If you want to have a discussion, then listen to the points. If you want to troll, try using different material, as this one has too many holes in it to be worthy of a good effort!

: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:32 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

its a shame manly didnt have proper trial games to get ready for the nrl rather than the distraction of the wcc

No, it's a shame they couldn't keep their fists and dicks to themselves, that would've improved their preperation.

: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:32 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

Which is the same excuse Leeds came out with last year after getting stuffed by Castleford.

The point I've made is totally relevant to the point you're trying to make. Teams often lose after big intense games. It therefore doesn't reflect badly on Leeds. If it does, it therefore means that Melbourne losing to Leeds last year reflects badly on them because Cas beat Leeds. It is exactly the same situation but reversed.

If you want to have a discussion, then listen to the points. If you want to troll, try using different material, as this one has too many holes in it to be worthy of a good effort!

funny thing is, youve accused me of being a poor troll, and youve responded 3 times to this thread already.

and you are even attempting now to discuss the issue with me as well.

imagine if i was a good troll how difficult i could make things?

: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:33 pm  

Banger wrote:

No, it's a shame they couldn't keep their fists and dicks to themselves, that would've improved their preperation.

typical english response

when they cant win on the field, they resort to a cheap shot.